Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Max Woolf ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 38 posts · 19d ago
Dylan Hadfield-Menell Grace Colin Max Woolf austin Singularity's Bounty e/cc coty.bsky.social austegard.com
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I honestly think it would understand it okay, it might do better with longer context, I’m not sure. But I would definitely need to experiment with different ways of formatting the context” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Grace: I made a little Jev-based language model! It uses beam search + Jev as a classifier to judge branches based on coherence and "success" (whatever that means). I've barely talked to it so I don't kno…
Grace: (you'll need to tag him)
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 17d ago
Max Woolf Long Lasting Mascot
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Pretty much all ML/NLP research since 2007 was based on Common Crawl which was scraped web pages. BERT was trained off of Wikipedia dumps. It was far from taboo in ML research, it's just that the r…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Max Woolf: Pretty much all ML/NLP research since 2007 was based on Common Crawl which was scraped web pages. BERT was trained off of Wikipedia dumps. It was far from taboo in ML research, it's just that the r…
Max Woolf: Pointing out that his point is ahistorical. At the least until ~2019, the scraping of data for ML was generally accepted and didn't have much criticism around IP. (aside from the ImageNet lawsuits …
Open the thread →