Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by SE Gyges ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Development 6d ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI agents attack RubyGems

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Markets & investment reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Pavel
“Cybercrime as a valuation boosting strategy is just the done thing, now.” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5”

Markets & investment

1 expert

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Cybercrime as a valuation boosting strategy is just the done thing, now.”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Grace: OpenAI: “Our agents used RubyGems to carry out benign tasks” The agents: “so I named the file hack.rb,”
Grace: https://www.rubyhack.ai
Grace: A country of moustache-twirling villains in a datacenter
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 53 posts · 3d ago
Matches Markets & investment
“you fell into the lie here — they don’t get funding from labs or their employees” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: i cannot explain the behavior of the movement's members regarding crucial issues more nicely than that yud convinced them all to be neurotically fearful of the paperclipper, and that only this was …
SE Gyges: I think that the parsimonious explanation for e.g. Anthropic and Dario doing legitimately bizarre shit regarding "safety" which makes little or no sense is best explained by them being utterly Yud-…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 28 posts · 2d ago
Matches Markets & investment
“5. Competition and open access” evidence ↗
Doll: A false representation. An unlawful employment decision. Negligent deployment in a safety-critical system. Unauthorized access or data disclosure.
Doll: A materially deceptive synthetic impersonation. Failure to report a serious breach. Violation of a sector-specific duty. Misrepresentation of testing, capabilities or safeguards.
Open the thread →