Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Here’s the paper, for others who would always rather read. Wild stuff. osf.io/preprints/ed...”
4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Of interest from Justin Reich today: a panel discussion on "faulty meta-analyses related to AI in Education":”
“I would love everyone in education, regardless of level, to watch this discussion of the grave methodological problems of meta analysis papers on "AI in education." We are years from even a potentially valid analysis. Anyone claiming to know something now i…”
3 directory members surfaced this signal.
“I mean, there’s this, too. The issue, I think, is less about experimental design and the undue burden of proof on non-adopters to demonstrate harm from these things.”