Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by tweety fish ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 20h ago

Ai silicon valley

9 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · rat king 🐀 👑 , Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L https://t.co/JgaVpDrbaO” evidence ↗
9 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: the amount of begging the question that has infected the discourse top to bottom when new models come out is uh well it's not my favorite
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 28 posts · 2d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“lol I mean come the fuck on man. Of course it fucking is. If you hate AI enough to avoid any software coded using it—fine! supportable! go with god!—then at least use a fucking modicum of critical …” evidence ↗
tweety fish: lol I mean come the fuck on man. Of course it fucking is. If you hate AI enough to avoid any software coded using it—fine! supportable! go with god!—then at least use a fucking modicum of critical …
tweety fish: “Wow this would probably take like a hundred+ hours of work if you weren’t using AI and is super polished and elaborate and was made and released on a lark, not going to think about that any furthe…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 13 posts · 2d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“My broad position is that I'm: - big believer in the benefits - suspect it will be disruptive to knowledge work (probably myself) - Deeply concerned about who is getting wealth on it - I think cari…” evidence ↗
Isaiah Bishop: I think i have approached my limit on hearing about AI just generally in my everyday life when i'm not seeking it out
Isaiah Bishop: My broad position is that I'm: - big believer in the benefits - suspect it will be disruptive to knowledge work (probably myself) - Deeply concerned about who is getting wealth on it - I think cari…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 16 posts · 20d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Yeah. Agreed. I think this is a type of AI psychosis that I think people will get a handle on though and return to the expectation that their work is supposed to be good” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: Very obviously the outcome of people mobbing those who publicly admit they use AI is everyone continuing to use it but hiding it
Eugene Vinitsky: This is a tool whose use is mostly unobservable. Solve for equilibrium
Open the thread →
4 experts · 13 posts · 6d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“(But I am biased... some people prefer to explore, others exploit, and I think we should explore more, and exploit less.)” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 1 Context & explanation · 1
tweety fish: with the enthusiastic cheerleading of the EPA and a deep jealously of what musk gets away with in the background
Michael Ekstrand: the problem with data centers is that even if in their pure form they're literally just low-impact light industry, in their current american form they're the pet projects of a speed-obsessed ventur…
Open the thread →