Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Age of ai icm Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings Europe 2031 — What getting AI wrong means for us Policy & governance · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by tachikoma ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago

Age of ai icm

6 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo James Grimmelmann Benjamin Riley Paul Ford tachikoma
Primary source teorth.github.io ↗
Established Policy & governance Analysis 16d ago
⚡ 14 h early
Europe 2031 AI failure risks analysis

Europe 2031 — What getting AI wrong means for us

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tom Schaul Judith Dada Michiel Bakker tachikoma Stefanie Hane
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“First the Fable ban, now this. The https://t.co/w7TUnJHWxU timeline keeps accelerating 😬 https://t.co/hXJys0ags9”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“a new AI 2027 scenario is out but this time focused on Europe. nothing in it is new, but the scenario laid out seems more realistic than the 2027 version because the scope is tighter. the timeline though might be too fast, hard to say.”

Primary source europe2031.ai ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 23 posts · 11d ago
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Pwnallthethings tachikoma B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them) brennan
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ted Underwood: People who know about game design: Do you think open-world procedural narrative on the fly is bottlenecked by hardware, or is it a situation where players just don’t in practice want the openness t…
Ted Underwood: Or are we already building that? I am kind of gaming illiterate beyond Sim City, Civ, and hazy memories of Bioshock.
Open the thread →