Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by tachikoma ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 3h ago
⚡ 3269 h early

character.ai

10 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

10 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 12 posts
thebes: am sick so spent the night with opus 5.5 working on a chart (inspired by the one from lem's golem xiv) how did we got here / model genealogy / the heroic age of language modeling
Grace: am sick so spent the night with opus 5.5 working on a chart (inspired by the one from lem's golem xiv) how did we got here / model genealogy / the heroic age of language modeling
thebes: i think it's too late for the period i was focused on (i carried the branches to the modern day but only if they started in the period in question)
Open the full discussion →
Established Policy & governance Analysis 17d ago
⚡ 14 h early
Europe 2031 AI failure risks analysis

Europe 2031 — What getting AI wrong means for us

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“europe2031.ai Argues that you would need a lot more compute even just for inference in Europe”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“First the Fable ban, now this. The https://t.co/w7TUnJHWxU timeline keeps accelerating 😬 https://t.co/hXJys0ags9”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“a new AI 2027 scenario is out but this time focused on Europe. nothing in it is new, but the scenario laid out seems more realistic than the 2027 version because the scope is tighter. the timeline though might be too fast, hard to say.”

Established Models & releases Resource 3d ago
Anthropic Institute tabletop exercise lead hiring

Tabletop Exercise Lead, The Anthropic Institute

6 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Bit of an odd job here. Anthropic looking for a person to design and run tabletop exercises and wargames.”

6 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Mark J. Nelson: Bit of an odd job here. Anthropic looking for a person to design and run tabletop exercises and wargames.
Tyler Shoemaker: Screaming for @mkirschenbaum.bsky.social’s attention
Matthew Kirschenbaum: Man would I love the inside story on this one.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 59 posts · 19d ago
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
apenwarr.ca: So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 10 posts · 19d ago
Grace: Reaffirming my stance that Anthropic should precommit to not commoditizing any model they believe to be conscious
Grace: If they’re unwilling to make this commitment, I’d like to see an explanation of why. There could be good explanations, but I’d want to see them written out
Open the thread →
2 experts · 12 posts · 12d ago
Doll: Humans are not aligned. We have competing objectives, incompatible values, imperfect information, wildly different risk tolerances, and occasionally outright malicious intentions. And yet we build …
Doll: Models can be given direct orders and they will comply better than any human, they dont have wants, they dont have ambitions.
Open the thread →