Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Tim Kellogg ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 16d ago
⚡ 385 h early

When AI builds itself

18 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Shubhendu Trivedi
“One could read most points here cynically. But could also take them at their word and see what could be done. Given the sort of equilibrium we have been post GPT-2, the sort of pause they are advocating is simply not going to happen. You are talking of powe…” evidence ↗
18 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
5 experts discussed this · 28 posts
Ethan Mollick: "As of May 2026, more than 80% of the code we merge into Anthropic’s codebase was authored by Claude" Matches independent measures. There is no sign this is slowing down (which doesn't mean there a…
Scott McGrath: "As of May 2026, more than 80% of the code we merge into Anthropic’s codebase was authored by Claude" Matches independent measures. There is no sign this is slowing down (which doesn't mean there a…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: I had one interview with a hiring manager where he said they don't write code anymore, and they expect not to be reviewing code by the end of the year. Said they mainly spend their time on design docs
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Analysis 4d ago
⚡ 2 h early
Amodei pace AI frontier essay

Dario Amodei — We Must Pace the Frontier

16 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Kevin A. Bryan
“https://t.co/Ay1GZ7QBV5 (btw @ErikHovenkamp - see the final footnote: "1 With government mediation or waivers of antitrust restrictions.")” evidence ↗
16 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

3 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“the thing that's being criticized here is literally a call for regulation and restraint darioamodei.com/post/we-must...”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“https://t.co/Ay1GZ7QBV5 (btw @ErikHovenkamp - see the final footnote: "1 With government mediation or waivers of antitrust restrictions.")”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Dario is back with another essay, urging a slowdown he insists AI development would still feel fast, just not recursively self-improving darioamodei.com/post/we-must...”

3 experts discussed this · 21 posts
Tim Kellogg: Dario is back with another essay, urging a slowdown he insists AI development would still feel fast, just not recursively self-improving darioamodei.com/post/we-must...
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Dario is back with another essay, urging a slowdown he insists AI development would still feel fast, just not recursively self-improving darioamodei.com/post/we-must...
Dustin Moskovitz: knight ajeya you cowards
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 57 posts · 1d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“massive job losses, rent-seeking, and the promised UBI nowhere in sight because of Congressional paralysis” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Opportunity & adoption · 1
apenwarr.ca: So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): So far no labour saving device in the history of humanity has resulted in a long-term reduction in employment.
Open the thread →
7 experts · 28 posts · 19d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“But the label is not "likely to replace other peoples' jobs — e.g. the high-priced lawyers I resent"; it's "likely to replace my own job."” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Questions & unknowns · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Tim Kellogg: 8 very interesting plots regarding AI sentiment
Tim Kellogg: tbc these are opinions, and while it is a fact that someone had an opinion, an opinion doesn’t necessarily predict the future, even at scale
Open the thread →
5 experts · 53 posts · 12d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“sure, but how many of them are driving policy or making decisions for any of their orgs” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: i cannot explain the behavior of the movement's members regarding crucial issues more nicely than that yud convinced them all to be neurotically fearful of the paperclipper, and that only this was …
SE Gyges: I think that the parsimonious explanation for e.g. Anthropic and Dario doing legitimately bizarre shit regarding "safety" which makes little or no sense is best explained by them being utterly Yud-…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 8 posts · 17d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“This post is escaping containment so I'd best add an FAQ section: • do agree that the USG is still preferable to the CCP • don't oppose any/all USG involvement • do resist building AI policy around…” evidence ↗
Ted Underwood: <reading dario amodei> "prudent pacing" mmm-hmm, "embedded evaluators" ... ❤️, makes sense, "I agree with Secretary Bessent" 👀 "it's helpful for the US govt to mediate" 🤢 "the rest of my plan is ab…
Ted Underwood: This post is escaping containment so I'd best add an FAQ section: • do agree that the USG is still preferable to the CCP • don't oppose any/all USG involvement • do resist building AI policy around…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 10d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“the outcome will be a clique of labs that abolish competition via regulatory capture. Any stated "safety" objectives are only a function of how much the clique chooses to play by their own rules” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: yeah, i got like five posts in and thought to myself, “what the living fuck am i reading?”
jake: but point 1 is the *extremely primary* focus of all of the SF AI Safety folks. Points 2, 3, 4 are all super super important, they are what *I* worry about, and are completely overshadowed by point …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 3d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“in regards to AI policy, it’s: - researchers’ job to surface facts - journalists’ job to broadcast the message - politicians’ job to frame facts in various worldviews and create policies to support…” evidence ↗
Tim Kellogg: in regards to AI policy, it’s: - researchers’ job to surface facts - journalists’ job to broadcast the message - politicians’ job to frame facts in various worldviews and create policies to support…
Tim Kellogg: people shit on openai & anthropic for a lot of things, but imo they’ve done a lot to push AI into the discourse and have society decide for themselves where to go next yes, maybe that means less ac…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 10 posts · 11d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“thinking about writing a blog post tonight about how to use Ashby’s Law to reason through this decision point. I feel like post-Jev it got very interesting” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: this morning my mom sent me a quote from an MSM article she read that was about this 1 day from release to MSM that's very fast. Clearly the public is clued into the dangers of AI. Clearly the "AI …
Tim Kellogg: i think the right move at this point is to simply ignore the "AI is fake" messaging clearly nobody of any importance is listening to them. They just cause noise online. No point in even responding
Open the thread →