Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Analysis 1d ago
why not use generative AI video

Why I don't use generative 'AI'

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Baldur Bjarnason
“The final entry in this batch of short videos on why I don't use generative "AI": Plagiarism with monkeys is still plagiarism youtube.com/shorts/fcFLG... The rest of the series is in this playlist. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“The final entry in this batch of short videos on why I don't use generative "AI": Plagiarism with monkeys is still plagiarism youtube.com/shorts/fcFLG... The rest of the series is in this playlist. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...”

Developing Models & releases Analysis 1d ago
generative AI plagiarism critique video

Why I don't use generative 'AI': Plagiarism with monkeys is still plagiarism #tech #chatbot #agents

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Baldur Bjarnason
“The final entry in this batch of short videos on why I don't use generative "AI": Plagiarism with monkeys is still plagiarism youtube.com/shorts/fcFLG... The rest of the series is in this playlist. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“The final entry in this batch of short videos on why I don't use generative "AI": Plagiarism with monkeys is still plagiarism youtube.com/shorts/fcFLG... The rest of the series is in this playlist. www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Idk how some of these were actually produced. Were the anabology ones produced by Grok? If so, that seems like another win for Anthropic: turning competitors' products into your hype men.” evidence ↗
Ted Underwood: If I'm one of Anthropic's competitors, I'm not feeling happy about any of this.
Ted Underwood: Companies can spend $500k in brand identity design, plus several million dollars in advertising, and still not get what Anthropic is being gifted here, for a total investment of this:
Open the thread →
5 experts · 18 posts · 1d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“i think the real through line is probably "we don't know how this complex system works, but we keep laying off the people who maintain it" like maybe not related by a literal technical causal conne…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Damien Williams: I'm honestly not sure it's "a story in 3 parts" material but there's gonna be a lot of speculation— & hopefully actual investigation—re: whether the Microsoft outage, the air traffic control "AI" r…
Anthony Moser: i think the real through line is probably "we don't know how this complex system works, but we keep laying off the people who maintain it" like maybe not related by a literal technical causal conne…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 20 posts · 22h ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Also, you are using ‘common sense’ and then demanding tests of me? No. Get your own house in order and then we can talk” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Andrew D Wilson: I see why these guys are impressed with a technology that just fires off words without any thought
Andrew D Wilson: Gen AI does not think. They also don’t even solve maths problems - people solve maths problems with them. Left alone, no LLM goes looking for things to do And it’s only unoriginal because it has be…
Open the thread →