Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Questions & unknowns
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Culture, work & education Analysis 14h ago
⚡ 10 h early
AI surveillance smart lamp-posts essay

Spies in the sky: how worried should we be about the arrival of AI-enabled smart lamp-posts?

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Social Media Lab
“Coming to a city near you. "Spies in the sky: how worried should we be about the arrival of AI-enabled smart lamp-posts?" www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Social Media Lab Jake Laperruque

“Coming to a city near you. "Spies in the sky: how worried should we be about the arrival of AI-enabled smart lamp-posts?" www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...”

“www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...”

Primary source theguardian.com ↗
New AI field signal Signal 14h ago

Amazon

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Kyle
“And guess who has the only book on MCP fully (or at least wicked close) up to date with the latest spec and Python SDK? www.amazon.com/AI-Agents-MC...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Kyle

“And guess who has the only book on MCP fully (or at least wicked close) up to date with the latest spec and Python SDK? www.amazon.com/AI-Agents-MC...”

Primary source amazon.com ↗
New AI field signal Signal 9h ago

Mark zuckerberg meta ai

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Michael Zimmer
“Hey @nytimes.com: Where's the actual interview? You merely quote Zuck a handful of times in this piece. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/t...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Michael Zimmer

“Hey @nytimes.com: Where's the actual interview? You merely quote Zuck a handful of times in this piece. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/t...”

Primary source nytimes.com ↗
New Agents & robotics Signal 14h ago
⚡ 8 h early

Regularization in RL, Why RL Generalizes, and Why SFT Forgets | RLHF & Post-training Book Lecture 10

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Nathan Lambert
“00:00 Intro & the role of regularization 02:50 The KL penalty in RL 10:53 RL as a reverse KL loss 21:09 Why RL generalizes better than SFT 25:15 Other regularization tools www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwpY...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Nathan Lambert

“00:00 Intro & the role of regularization 02:50 The KL penalty in RL 10:53 RL as a reverse KL loss 21:09 Why RL generalizes better than SFT 25:15 Other regularization tools www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwpY...”

Primary source youtube.com ↗
Developing AI business Development 1d ago
chip stocks fall AI jitters

Chip stocks slide in US and Asia as AI jitters rattle investors

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈
“Is that the sound of a bubble starting to pop? 🤨 #AIHype #GenAI www.bbc.com/news/article...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈

“Is that the sound of a bubble starting to pop? 🤨 #AIHype #GenAI www.bbc.com/news/article...”

Primary source bbc.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 12 posts · 8h ago
Ted Underwood jake tachikoma
Matches Questions & unknowns
“this regime ends in 2029, but what comes next? what if it's worse, not just ideologically but in terms of vision and competence?” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
tachikoma: this regime ends in 2029, but what comes next? what if it's worse, not just ideologically but in terms of vision and competence?
tachikoma: we should try to avoid that outcome by building resilience, which i think comes from decentralization, on the web and in the physical world
Open the thread →
3 experts · 11 posts · 7h ago
Luke Stark Ali Alkhatib Andy Masley
Matches Questions & unknowns
“People have two separate questions about using AI: how do individual prompts affect their own carbon and water footprint, and how bad is the industry overall. Here I’m trying to answer the first on…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Luke Stark: Turned this rant into a blog post. davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/the-data-c...
Ali Alkhatib: on point 2, something i don't see proponents grapple with is that the current buildout is absolutely not the totality of data centers meant to be built. there will need to be more (and considerably…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 10h ago
Justin Hendrix Kate Klonick Jake Laperruque
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Yeah but I should have added "Have you considered an open letter?" under "Do you work for an AI Company"” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Kate Klonick: Yeah but I should have added "Have you considered an open letter?" under "Do you work for an AI Company"
Jake Laperruque: Can we add a "How scared are you of LOSING THE AI ARMS RACE TO CHINA?!?" path to avoid all the pesky regulation discussion
Open the thread →