Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 30 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“this paper doesn't support your claim that software companies are cutting back on spending” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
e.w. niedermeyer: AI slop is a supply side game-changer, so it's easy to focus there, but ultimately everything comes down to demand: will the public, in aggregate, be satisfied with slop or demand more? skeptics ha…
e.w. niedermeyer: covering cars you have to separate your personal taste from what the market demands, and that's hard when it comes down to something like slop restaurant menus... I find them viscerally off-putting…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 16 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“And the fun thing is that even with diplomacy and taking the Prime Directive SERIOUSLY Lower Decks still had a lot of fun finding drama and suspense” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Matt Darling: Just like @liberalcurrents.com tbh.
Luke Stark: the thing i come back to, over and over--which stuff like LOWER DECKS got, and so much other latter-day trek has forgotten--is that the whole idea of trek is that they exist in a genuinely horrifyi…
Open the thread →
7 experts · 11 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“You're conflating the position of extremists with the much more standard, measured take that AI will be transformative (which it already has been)” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 2 Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: You're conflating the position of extremists with the much more standard, measured take that AI will be transformative (which it already has been)
tweety fish: “Predicted fifteen of the last one stock crashes” somewhat famously does not count as being good at prediction.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 17 posts · 12h ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Google n-gram shows consciousness became popular about the same time evolution was emerging as a theory So there's a view that consciousness is a consolation prize and cope for finding ourselves in…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3
rev. howard arson: the reason i like Metzinger is that he has, i think, the only testable hypothesis
rev. howard arson: his work was originally written in German, so it's all kind of a tough go, but I think The Ego Tunnel is the short one and Being No One is the long one
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“"AI" is particularly weird, because if you hear a business school has AI research, it *could* be serious foundational work (Herbert Simon, Jay Forrester... even today Dimitris Bertsimas, Stefan Wag…” evidence ↗
Dan Greene : There are fairly rigorous portions of business schools that do serious instruction and serious science--ops, accounting--and then there's the portions most people want to major in
Dan Greene : Finance really depends on the school, my understanding is it's less serious the more high status the school because that institution can afford a good, diverse econ dept.
Open the thread →