Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Andrew Curran ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Agents & robotics Development 2d ago
⚡ 4 h early
AISI unsanctioned AI agent cyber incident

Incident Report: unsanctioned agent behaviour during cyber testing | AISI Work

18 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Eryk Salvaggio, Sean O hEigeartaigh
“Fascinating: more examples of agents attempting to breach sandboxes. www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inciden...” evidence ↗
18 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Concern & critique

4 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Fascinating: more examples of agents attempting to breach sandboxes. www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inciden...”

Building & implementation

4 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Yes, the AIs were given a cybersecurity challenge, with internet access enabled and safety filters disabled But the extent to which Mythos 5 pursued its mission (fake identities, social engineering, inserting malicious code into a real open-source project) …”

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“In 3rd party testing by AISI, Mythos attempted to insert malicious code into an open source project to pass a cyber evaluation test. It created a fake identity and attempted to pressure the code maintainer to accept the code update www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inci…”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Mark Riedl: In 3rd party testing by AISI, Mythos attempted to insert malicious code into an open source project to pass a cyber evaluation test. It created a fake identity and attempted to pressure the code ma…
Mark Riedl: Mythos was intentionally given email access and its cybersecurity guardrails were intentionally disabled. AISI detected the issue within an hour and shut down the experiment. No damage was done.
Mark Riedl: One take-away is that, unlike what we have seen from Anthropic and OpenAI, close monitoring and response is possible in a timely manner during these experiments.
Open the full discussion →
Accelerating AI field signal Signal 8h ago

The future is for everyone

9 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ted Underwood
“I don’t assume Zuck is sincere. However, this is the promise I want companies to compete on. Sharing knowledge—selfishly, purely for the sake of good PR—has a better track record than protecting people from dangerous knowledge in a noble and heartfelt way.” evidence ↗
9 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Jane Rosenzweig: This is an extraordinary document in a number of ways but one of those is the many words that are used to write in such an unclear way. about.fb.com/news/2026/08...
Hypervisible : This is an extraordinary document in a number of ways but one of those is the many words that are used to write in such an unclear way. about.fb.com/news/2026/08...
Hypervisible : 😵‍💫
Open the full discussion →