Year after the ai mandate nobody
3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Apropos of nothing at all, I keep thinking about this Reddit post. www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode...”
Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Apropos of nothing at all, I keep thinking about this Reddit post. www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode...”
9 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“We can practice being bold and clear with our positions, and in doing so set an example and create space for others to do the same, as @anthonymoser.com does so well here. anthonymoser.github.io/writing/ai/h... >>”
“asking for explanations from a system that is structurally incapable of understanding causal relationships does not seem like a good use of time to me”
13 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.
“This whole story is infurating, but this first quote from someone at OpenAI is really making me see red. "The newer version won't do this": a) why the fuck should we believe you and b) even if so, that has fuck-all to do with OpenAI's culpability here. www.…”
“I spent most of last year covering ChatGPT-4o's unsettling effects on some users. OpenAI pulled it off the market in February. @teddyrosenbluth.bsky.social writes about a software engineer who died in Feb who had been using 4o to help her go off her epileps…”
11 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
Rules, institutions and accountability.
“"Amnesty International finds that standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, depend on mass invasions of privacy by design, and are fundamentally incompatible with international human rights law."”
Risks, limits and unintended consequences.
“> Without significant changes to how these systems are developed and deployed, they will continue to undermine international human rights laws and standards. www. amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/0996/2026/en/ This is a pretty good report overall. Hard to dis…”
4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
Risks, limits and unintended consequences.
““Psychologists shouldn't replace thinking with AI | Radboud University” https://www.ru.nl/en/research/research-news/psychologists-shouldnt-replace-thinking-with-ai > If we truly want to advance the study of cognition, the authors argue, we can’t rely on AI …”
10 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.
Capital, companies and commercial impact.
“Chief Economist at Apollo--incredible name, Torsten Slok--sees no payoff for AI outside tech so far. Doesn't see any productivity growth (big measurement problem admittedly). Revenue per employee and profit margins are up in the magnificent 7 but flat every…”
2 experts are actively discussing the implications.
“Weirdly I get a 404 but the post is still up at www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/11...”
“So, apparently Bluesky's link redirector broke the link somehow by encoding a URL hash 🤷♂️ This link should work. www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2026/11...”
2 experts are actively discussing the implications.
“and in terms of comparing to sex ed, please do not... > How we talk about generative AI refusal matters. I think it’s wrong to compare generative AI refusal to an authoritarian, anti-science, anti-LGBTQ+, sexist framework for teaching young people about sex.”