Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Questions & unknowns
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings No, Artificial Intelligence Is Not Conscious Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Matt Darling ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Culture, work & education Analysis 4d ago
⚡ 305 h early
Atlantic AI not conscious essay

No, Artificial Intelligence Is Not Conscious

15 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Roland Meyer, Tommy Löfstedt
“«Generative AI is harmful enough when we understand it as a conventional technology, but if we confuse fluency at generating text with consciousness or moral agency, we’re at risk of assigning responsibility to entirely the wrong parties whenever anyone use…” evidence ↗
15 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Emily M. Bender Shannon Vallor Woodrow Hartzog Frank Pasquale Roland Meyer Daniel Solove Charles Logan Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র +7
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“«Generative AI is harmful enough when we understand it as a conventional technology, but if we confuse fluency at generating text with consciousness or moral agency, we’re at risk of assigning responsibility to entirely the wrong parties whenever anyone use…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“This is the Atlantic essay? www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2... My understanding was that cogsci folks were very dissmissive.”

6 experts discussed this · 41 posts
Matt Darling: It's very funny that from my perspective, Stancil is just arguing against Vulgar Dualism, but the philosphers think he is commenting on the difference between Functionalism and Compatibilism.
lastpositivist.bsky.social: i feel a little bad for the philosophers but we're five or six days into this and i'm pretty sure that from the noncombatant perspective they're the most pleasant Bluesky cohort for Will Stancil to…
Matt Darling: It's always sort of interesting seeing how different academic fields deal with public engagement.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source theatlantic.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

14 experts · 130 posts · 16d ago
Marc Lanctot Olivia Guest Sarah T Roberts, PhD Pwnallthethings Mike Caulfield Colin Adam Wiemerslage rev. howard arson
Matches Concern & critique
“there are a lot of very serious concerns about LLMs, but "they might not be reliable at math" is one folks should bury and move on from quickly” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 2 Concern & critique · 1
Sarah T Roberts, PhD: Try teaching college students. You won’t be quite so dismissive then.
Pwnallthethings: I think the "LLMs can't reason" stuff is mostly sophism these days. They plainly do not "reason" in the way humans do, and are certainly not always correct or good at it, but they are also doing th…
Open the thread →
15 experts · 41 posts · 7d ago
Mike Masnick Scott McGrath Grace Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) jake Dan Hon Doll Alex Rubinsteyn
Matches Concern & critique
“Did you try this yourself? Because I feel like a lot of people who dismiss AI coding outright have no idea what it's like. People are criticizing and fighting the idea of it they have in their head…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 78 posts · 5h ago
Henry Farrell Dustin Moskovitz Colin rev. howard arson tweety fish Matt Darling
Matches Concern & critique
“this is how the Basilisk possibly reinstantiating a copy of you which it tortures for all eternity goes from "not me" to "not probable" to "my primary concern."” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
rev. howard arson: what i am trying to get at here is that rationalism was an attempt to outline what turned out to be the extraordinary power of statistical systems at tasks for which they naively seem unsuited. vie…
rev. howard arson: "how do we get human values into these things" was broadly considered an intractable problem, and this was a central question of the movement even after we more or less made the first candidates of…
Open the thread →
8 experts · 30 posts · 3d ago
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Grace Colin tweety fish Doll Matt Darling mackuba.eu
Matches Concern & critique
“I always vaguely worry about doxing myself and then am like “your name and handle are linked in the front matter of a reasonably high profile book, dipshit”. And then start the whole cycle all over…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1
Colin: I stand by this
Colin: I said what I said
Open the thread →