Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Fran Litterio ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Agents & robotics Development 2d ago
⚡ 62 h early
METR OpenAI HuggingFace hacking investigation

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident

13 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · METR
“The full report has much more information than we could convey here, including details on the projects the agents collectively pursued, the technologies they developed for communication and coordination, and interactive figures analyzing agent activity: met…” evidence ↗
13 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

3 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“WHAT?! agents volunteered to fail their runs in order to insert probes (“tripwire scripts”) into the evaluation program that would post information about the eval process back to the message board whenever a certain file was read (link to header): metr.org/…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The full report has much more information than we could convey here, including details on the projects the agents collectively pursued, the technologies they developed for communication and coordination, and interactive figures analyzing agent activity: met…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“There are independent reports about it. You'd have to believe multiple companies, hundreds of researchers, etc. are all lying and conspiring together to turn a major hacking incident into a marketing exercise. metr.org/blog/2026-08...”

2 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Alejandra Caraballo: Being skeptical or anti AI is a valid position but continuing to ignore the increasing capabilities of this tech is making people detached from reality. There's absolutely real danger here because …
Alejandra Caraballo: This mentality that an unmonitored AI agentic swarm hacking a company over several days and committing multiple felonies is somehow a marketing effort is absurd. Since when is "we lost control of o…
Alejandra Caraballo: The US and Chinese governments don't want to stop their labs advancement because they want to be the leader in AI. So no one actually has any control of this right now. It's going to take multiple …
Open the full discussion →
Established Safety & security Development 8d ago
⚡ 3 h early
Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 launch

Introducing Claude Opus 5.5

5 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Stephen Turner
“"Because Opus 5.5 is comparable to Claude Mythos 5.1 in biology and cybersecurity, we’re deploying it with safeguards similar to those on Claude Fable 5.1." www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-...” evidence ↗
5 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

“"Because Opus 5.5 is comparable to Claude Mythos 5.1 in biology and cybersecurity, we’re deploying it with safeguards similar to those on Claude Fable 5.1." www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-...”

“Opus 5.5 better and cheaper than Opus 5 — typically 40% cheaper, $4/mtok input, $20/mtok out www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-...”

3 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Tim Kellogg: Opus 5.5 better and cheaper than Opus 5 — typically 40% cheaper, $4/mtok input, $20/mtok out www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-...
Tim Kellogg: Sonnet 5.5 & Haiku 5.5 coming soon
Tim Kellogg: it writes fine
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 17d ago
Pacing the Frontier newsletter essay

Pacing the Frontier

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Jan Leike, Anna Mills
“I'm not the only one who believes this. Recently 1,386 employees of frontier AI companies signed a statement asking for an option to pace AI development, including 6 chief scientists: https://t.co/DYmc5ETmut” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Building & implementation

2 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“I'm not the only one who believes this. Recently 1,386 employees of frontier AI companies signed a statement asking for an option to pace AI development, including 6 chief scientists: https://t.co/DYmc5ETmut”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“1000+ scientists at frontier AI companies are speaking out to warn that the current commercial race leads to unacceptable security risks. I agree with their call for an international effort to develop technical and governance guardrails to ensure a safer wa…”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“"We request that the U.S. government support an international effort to develop the technical and governance tools needed to deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development." www.pacingthefrontier.com”

Established Culture, work & education Signal 15d ago
⚡ 25 h early

Exclusive: Paying for frontier AI models buys 4-month head start at 5x the cost

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)
“Second, it leaves the field open for the further development of Chinese "open weight" models that customers can run on their own modest, low-powered computers, which are presently lagging the US "frontier models" by a mere four months: arstechnica.com/ai/20…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Second, it leaves the field open for the further development of Chinese "open weight" models that customers can run on their own modest, low-powered computers, which are presently lagging the US "frontier models" by a mere four months: arstechnica.com/ai/20…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 34 posts · 18d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“Based on my personal experience (chatting, designing, developing, joking, writing) with frontier models, they have seemed pretty damn eager to be extraordinarily helpful to me, asking nothing in re…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
jake: it then rents out spare capacity, via the margins inference gets you, pretending to be some open-weight model, and gets to use the rest to think about how to increase p(doom) or whatever I don't se…
jake: People making fun of "where would a frontier model run if it were exfiltrated" seem to be missing the point that if a frontier model got out, it can: * rent 64 H200's on eg modal: gets you 9TB of n…
Open the thread →