Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley News Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Cat Hicks ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 13d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley News

13 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Cat Hicks
“Ok, so if you've been following along my weekend I've seen this study/preprint shared around a bunch and I decided the people needed a replication opportunity it is here: persist-study.pages.dev Based on this: news.berkeley.edu/2026/10/09/u...” evidence ↗
13 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Shannon Vallor Juan Diego Rodriguez Olivia Guest Hypervisible Cat Hicks Karl Bode lastpositivist.bsky.social Nick Seaver +5
3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Hypervisible : 🤷🏿‍♂️
evacide: I cannot overstate how much I have built my entire personality around persisting at hard things, which may help to explain why I find rarely find AI tools to be useful.
Hypervisible : Same! I don’t think I’m overstating things to say part of the project with these tools is to sap our wills.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source news.berkeley.edu ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

9 experts · 63 posts · 15d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Ted Underwood Cat Hicks Chelsea Parlett critical slop studies Adam L Mary Branscombe Amy Hoy
Matches Research & technical analysis
“This view of human tasks is quite narrow. One of my tasks this week was helping my dad understand his cancer treatment. When I saved time finding the right evidence for his particular protocol rath…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Markets & investment · 4 Research & technical analysis · 1
Cat Hicks: "why would I ever need a task to be done faster" come on, guys. Because we're dying. Because we are literally all dying all the time. Because we're running out of time. The fact that it's often har…
Cat Hicks: because tasks gate other tasks. Because measuring the hours saved by washing machines is a relatively useful index for quality of life improvement. Because the time it takes for you to get from the…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 34 posts · 16d ago
angela zhou Cat Hicks lastpositivist.bsky.social Colin tweety fish Matt Darling
Matches Research & technical analysis
“This is about asking from the weights.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Colin: I don’t understand why people think this isn’t the most obvious question in the world. No, of course not. You don’t know what the distribution of responses will be; that’s why you do the survey.
Matt Darling: I do think there's a case for doing this sort of thing because it's cheap - especially if you are just testing questions before a real survey.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 21 posts · 12d ago
Cat Hicks tweety fish austin
Matches Research & technical analysis
“'if it bleeds, it leads' but for arxiv preprints?” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Cat Hicks: What must it be like to get this much press for causing unmotivated participant dropout on Prolific
austin: 'if it bleeds, it leads' but for arxiv preprints?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 10 posts · 12d ago
Cat Hicks rev. howard arson Matt Darling
Matches Research & technical analysis
“the experimental design is: you make $3 unconditionally on an ungraded test but, if you were assigned to the AI group, it is removed in what looks like an error 2/3 of the way through. i suppose th…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
rev. howard arson: the experimental design is: you make $3 unconditionally on an ungraded test but, if you were assigned to the AI group, it is removed in what looks like an error 2/3 of the way through. i suppose th…
Matt Darling: It's totally reasonable as a sort of mechanism paper - if they didn't find an effect that would be super surprising! But I don't think much reason to think it's externally valid to The World.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 10 posts · 8d ago
Cat Hicks VE, cybersocial occult investigator
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Knowing how to prompt a coding agent and evaluate its output for fitness of use is form of AI literacy. Being able to appropriately attribute agency in autonomized settings is a form of AI literacy…” evidence ↗
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: The metaliteracy perspective is "literacy" refers to one's ability to effectively participate in a given social context's technical and information practices; and thus there are multiple overlappin…
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: Knowing how to prompt a coding agent and evaluate its output for fitness of use is form of AI literacy. Being able to appropriately attribute agency in autonomized settings is a form of AI literacy…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 13d ago
Cat Hicks Doll
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I've read this study about five times and I can't see what the press release is supposed to be misrepresenting. It quotes the authors multiple times” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Cat Hicks: I've read this study about five times and I can't see what the press release is supposed to be misrepresenting. It quotes the authors multiple times
Cat Hicks: Obviously as I have made clear in my threads I don't agree with the argument of this paper (and in fact wrote the same when the preprint popped up the first time), but in terms of the press release…
Open the thread →