Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Claude Science, an AI workbench for scientists Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Cat Hicks ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI research Release 1d ago
⚡ 20 h early
Anthropic Claude Science workbench launch

Claude Science, an AI workbench for scientists

6 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Lior (AlphaSignal), Ben Williamson
“GeneBench-Pro: https://t.co/Qdj6oGuSAQ Claude Science: https://t.co/ztoVy8bqoY PAT paper: https://t.co/rHBE6uFM7x Check out https://t.co/8BDzBaqgEp to get a daily summary of the latest breakthrough news, models, papers and repos. Read by 300,000+ devs” evidence ↗
6 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Claude Cat Hicks Lior (AlphaSignal) Rohan Paul Ben Williamson Stephen Turner
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“GeneBench-Pro: https://t.co/Qdj6oGuSAQ Claude Science: https://t.co/ztoVy8bqoY PAT paper: https://t.co/rHBE6uFM7x Check out https://t.co/8BDzBaqgEp to get a daily summary of the latest breakthrough news, models, papers and repos. Read by 300,000+ devs”

Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 8d ago
Ted Underwood Cat Hicks Adam L
Matches Research & technical analysis
“To be charitable it's a hard thing to study in the context of MUCH research having design problems. To be uncharitable they should try a lot harder with the luxury they have of being people funded …” evidence ↗
Cat Hicks: To be charitable it's a hard thing to study in the context of MUCH research having design problems. To be uncharitable they should try a lot harder with the luxury they have of being people funded …
Adam L: maybe at some point one of these studies showing people using AI outsource critical judgment to their cognitive detriment won't turn out to have obvious experimental design problems but so far it's…
Open the thread →