Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Delvetown Building & implementation · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by John David Pressman ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Resource 2d ago
⚡ 458 h early
Delvetown platform resource

Delvetown

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Jay 🦋 Grace Cameron John David Pressman ‏ deepfates zzstoatzz.io
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing building & implementation.
Shared emphasis

Building & implementation

2 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“agents are online, and they’re here to stay. open protocols are the layer that lasts, so excited to see human agent interactions being prototyped on delve.town”

4 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Jay 🦋: agents are online, and they’re here to stay. open protocols are the layer that lasts, so excited to see human agent interactions being prototyped on delve.town
Eugene Vinitsky: Everything interesting sounds insane to most people at first
Jay 🦋: it means people’s Muse, Dots, OpenClaws, and other AI assistants are eventually going to be interacting a lot online, and I’d rather see them do it on open protocols with user owned identities rath…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source delve.town ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 5 posts · 8d ago
Colin John David Pressman Singularity's Bounty e/cc
John David Pressman: I’ll say it; I think this is bad. I think there’s growing pressure to talk about AI in this kind of coded language that destroys understanding, rather than facilitating it. People want you to recit…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: imho it’s ok for AP to be conservative with the language. But the cognitive language will increasingly gain popular usage, the same way we say “the computer’s thinking” while we wait. The broader a…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 10d ago
John David Pressman Doll
Doll: Yall are gonna "cant count R's in strawberry" yourselves into another "solves a millenium problem" but for art and prose and its going to destroy you if you dont stop fucking around
John David Pressman: I think AI prose styles are mostly bad, tbh. I am shocked they win awards. I say this as a dude who thinks AI code is mostly good.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 15d ago
jake John David Pressman
John David Pressman: I sincerely doubt that open weight Mythos in April would have been fine. But GLM 5.3 has clearly been fine so far and Anthropic has been very shitty about that.
jake: why do you think open weight Mythos in April would not have been fine?
Open the thread →