Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by mackuba.eu ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

15 experts · 40 posts · 5d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“A large amount of people are hating on Dame and Bailey for building the "bsky38" voting site that was going around the last few days, after they discovered that AI was used in building it, and espe…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
11 experts · 78 posts · 20d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“Yeah, so far. I highly doubt that tech which is highly useful for general software will somehow prove “not useful” in game development. It’s probably more due to social factors than functionality, …” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Opportunity & adoption · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
mackuba.eu: FFS, this is so fucked… 😩 Would it kill the people here to not chase away any tech person who comes here and says something about AI?… I really want tech discussions and communities to hang out her…
Mike Masnick: And now I'm getting shit upon for merely repeating what people told me, which some jackasses are misrepresenting. 🙄 Doing a lot of blocking unfortunately.
Open the thread →
6 experts · 18 posts · 17d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“I'm not so sure anymore. I would simply never recommend Anthropic models for development or agent deployment anymore, it's just much easier to use almost anything else now” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
mackuba.eu: 👀
mackuba.eu: Huh
Open the thread →
3 experts · 7 posts · 4h ago
Matches Building & implementation
“By building agents and harnesses and providing custom agentic solutions to your specific problems.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
mackuba.eu: Ok but… how do they make money then
mackuba.eu: But if it's open weight, then anyone can provide inference from what they trained, so why would they spend money on the training?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 23 posts · 19d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“we'll see. i run all sorts of configurations, and i do believe that having good routers down to specialized models of varying capability will happen, but there are some missing pieces (implementati…” evidence ↗
Doll: this right here, folks, is why the "it isnt a given that its going to happen! if we just resist ai might go away!" is pretty much not going to happen. but i guess you can keep thinking that for may…
jake: why will the price go up, exactly? a) there are now many players close to the edge of the pareto optimal frontier, so competition on price is there, and b) each generation of model leads to the pre…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 9 posts · 5d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“I think that this is something that a lot of the anti-AI crowd miss by choosing to bury their heads in the sand. Software developers will be (and already are!) the first to try and make this techno…” evidence ↗
Emily Hunt: I am determined to prove that you can be largely anti-AI but also not be an asshole. The attitudes of some people on this site will NOT win over any minds or win you over any favours. If you insult…
Emily Hunt: I despise AI companies and their goals. I am deeply passionate about climate action, and I weigh any positives that AI can bring against the critical need for us to save our planet right now. I am …
Open the thread →
4 experts · 7 posts · 17d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“Yeah, OpenAI launched 5.6 as "Sol is the best, but Terra is for normal everyday stuff", but in practice it's totally fine for me to just have Sol set permanently and use it for everything” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
mackuba.eu: Yeah, OpenAI launched 5.6 as "Sol is the best, but Terra is for normal everyday stuff", but in practice it's totally fine for me to just have Sol set permanently and use it for everything
Dan Hon: Claude make me an artifact that illustrates price elasticity
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 20d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“But you can choose to build all your software without touching it if that's your wish, nothing wrong with that… like you can be a vegan in a mostly meat-eating world” evidence ↗
mackuba.eu: But you can choose to build all your software without touching it if that's your wish, nothing wrong with that… like you can be a vegan in a mostly meat-eating world
mackuba.eu: I definitely see some level of not-seriousness in the "organic", especially compared to things like "slopware list"
Open the thread →