Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by René Walter ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established AI research Resource 7d ago
⚡ 31 h early
In the Weights newsletter issue

IN THE WEIGHTS

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“are you in the weights? Hilarious and fascinating including the mess ups intheweights.com”

“I did not know of this joke quote Funnily enough, a tool for seeing how you're weighted in the LLMs recently told me that Kashmir Hill is either me or a Himalayan mountain range, so it could indeed be a land of contradictions. Tool: intheweights.com”

4 experts discussed this · 6 posts
austin: fun? I am in there. intheweights.com
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: Well, my strategy of having an incredibly common wallet name is still rendering me invisible to information systems.
austin: weirdly enough my github handle actually had a better score than my wallet name
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Resource 18d ago
⚡ 17 h early
AI Compass navigation guide resource

The AI Compass

15 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

15 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“not wrong! bambamramfan.github.io/ai-compass/”

“Source code here: github.com/bambamramfan... - try the quiz here: bambamramfan.github.io/ai-compass/”

4 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Grace: Did anyone else get this?
David Picard: Patron saint: Gary Marcus? Ouch! 😬🫣
Tim Duffy: I do recall one question where I wanted there to be one more extreme answer past the final option
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 11d ago
⚡ 3 h early
Atlantic essay AI writing tic

The Most Famous AI Writing Tic Is Also the Most Mysterious - The Atlantic

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“OK the truth is no one knows for sure why AIs love "It's not X—it's Y" but there are some strange and fascinating theories and I think this one is my favorite. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...”

““One of the main ways that AI models have continued to evolve is by training on text generated by other bots. That AI text is presumably replete with negative parallelism, which further bakes it into the newer model.” www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...”

3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Will Oremus: I set out to understand why AIs love negative parallelism. The answer wasn't just surprising—it was illuminating. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Will Oremus: OK the truth is no one knows for sure why AIs love "It's not X—it's Y" but there are some strange and fascinating theories and I think this one is my favorite. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Will Oremus: Anyway I hope you read the whole piece if you're interested, because it isn't just an explainer—it's a journey. Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 11d ago
On interpolatable archives essay

On Interpolatable Archives (Clean)

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“If you're interested, i recently used Aby Warburg in my take on LLMs goodinternet.substack.com/p/on-interpo...”

4 experts discussed this · 4 posts
austin: oh i like this
Dan Hon: Oooh that's goo
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: Ehhh, this falls down as soon as you imagine anything that is actually bad. "I have a hungry ghost in a jar making nonconsensual nude imagry of children"—definitely something a hungry ghost in a ja…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 37 posts · 10d ago
Ted Underwood: Anyone commenting on AI should be asked 1) Did you expect few-shot learning? 2) When chat came out, did you say "this will change syllabi"? 3) Did you predict agentic coding? If the answers are no,…
Ted Underwood: People are getting a pass on this because *most* of us missed these calls. But that's the wrong response. Actually, none of us deserve a pass. We all have burned fingers, and we all should have lea…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 8 posts · 12d ago
Eryk Salvaggio: We really must acknowledge that when you see “AI” making half-assed work it’s because someone looked at it, said “good enough” and shared that half-ass work just to stand by it, point out that it w…
Eryk Salvaggio: Like yes Gen AI UX is designed to encourage half-assery but Netflix is designed to keep you binge watching and we would not tolerate an academic staying up all night watching the Great British Bake…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 2 posts · 7d ago
René Walter: Let's not forget that China by committing to open weights and AI-support especially for developing countries also means cementing a censored dictatorial episteme around the world in which Tiananmen…
Sung Kim: After the continual genocide coverup in Gaza, I am questioning Uyghur camps.....
Open the thread →