Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by René Walter ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago
⚡ 3670 h early

Companies Are Using Reddit to Manipulate ChatGPT and Google AI Search

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Joanna Bryson: So we all knew how to “google bomb” back in the 00s (remember liar -> Tony Blair?) by linking one page from several others. Is there a gemini bomb? how do we do it? (Hard to believe it’s “unintenti…
Lilian Edwards: It's "LLM grooming" now I believe and takes state actor level resources
Joanna Bryson: Have you a Url about that, by chance?
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Signal 5d ago
⚡ 26 h early

The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: I will register some frustration with Anthropic, who tend to write about “functional emotions” in a way that makes it seems like “functional” is in a tiny font and “emotions” is in a huge one, when…
Grace: I also don’t want to draw strong conclusions about the “realness” of these emotions or sensations, other than to caution that it’s an area where it’s easy to jump to conclusions about the implicati…
Grace: I don’t want to downplay it too much, because I’m honestly not sure if I would’ve predicted it beforehand, but in hindsight it looks pretty expected given the pretraining objective. You should expe…
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Analysis 16d ago
Suleyman model welfare warning

A warning about ‘model welfare’

7 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

7 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, feelings, or consciousness. And we must not train them to act…”

“this is manipulative design by AI companies. you should read this, written by the head of Microsoft AI: mustafa-suleyman.ai/a-warning-ab...”

2 experts discussed this · 28 posts
Shannon Vallor: A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, f…
Shannon Vallor: This essay is such a weird, incoherent bag of correct, useful insights (mostly echoing the work of others who aren't cited, with the welcome exception of @anilseth.bsky.social), mixed with 'wait wh…
Luke Stark: A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, f…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article