Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by SE Gyges ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 46 posts · 8d ago
Ted Underwood Pwnallthethings SE Gyges Matthew Sheffield
Matches Building & implementation
“A completely reasonable question then, is why not just slow down AI development, perhaps generally, or just for cybersecurity, until we can fix bugs at a more leisurely pace, instead of what feels …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Markets & investment · 1
Pwnallthethings: This is going to be a big deal, but easy to get the wrong end of the stick on it. So I think it's worth breaking down what actually happened, why, and what it actually means, based on the public in…
Pwnallthethings: Upfront tl;dr: a model at OAI hacked out of a constrained environment inside OAI and hacked a *different* company autonomously, without authorization from any human in order to creatively solve a t…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 25 posts · 19h ago
Pwnallthethings SE Gyges david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Building & implementation
“sorry, "there is a letter today, of whom by far the most famous person who signed it was dario, that says we should 'pace' as in 'slow down' ai development"” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: here's who signed both the Pacing the Frontier letter released today and the Pause AI letter in 2023 demanding an end to all research for six months also, raw counts for "signed today's letter" and…
SE Gyges: fundamentally this is an anthropic thing that managed to recruit some people from other companies
Open the thread →
4 experts · 26 posts · 5d ago
SE Gyges rev. howard arson tweety fish coty.bsky.social
Matches Building & implementation
“surely the *checks notes* country of china is short on *checks notes* engineers and mathematicians and could not possibly compete at the engineering and applied mathematics field *touches earpiece*…” evidence ↗
SE Gyges: in case anyone doesn't know this the thing about open weights models being made by stealing outputs from big players is almost entirely made up to justify regulations locking openai, anthropic and …
SE Gyges: i cannot explain the timeline better than Rohit here it is literally impossible to have made Kimi K3 off of Fable outputs on this timeline
Open the thread →
4 experts · 21 posts · 3d ago
Tim Kellogg Grace SE Gyges Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Building & implementation
“Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms
Grace: Maybe that’s just broke and bespoke combined? (Besproke?)
Open the thread →
4 experts · 17 posts · 18d ago
Tim Kellogg SE Gyges Cameron apenwarr.ca
Matches Building & implementation
“I mean, I think people forget that this is a huge part of Anthropic's MO. Opus 4 was COMICALLY expensive because they didn't want people to build on it but wanted to demonstrate the frontier, and t…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: what is Anthropic’s plan exactly? Sol kicks ass and they’re just going to *take Fable away???*
SE Gyges: i am pretty sure everything they had a plan for turned out not to happen and they're just sort of winging it atm
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 7d ago
Eli Sennesh SE Gyges
Matches Building & implementation
“>finally get what fable's saying today >you write out the whole generative model >sampling means integrating over this generative model >one of your random variables is literally just an intermedia…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Eli Sennesh: >finally get what fable's saying today >you write out the whole generative model >sampling means integrating over this generative model >one of your random variables is literally just an intermedia…
SE Gyges: i wonder if that's where this paper came from because it's kind of brilliant but also absurdly wrong in one way
Open the thread →