Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by SE Gyges ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Analysis 6d ago
alien message LessWrong alignment essay

That Alien Message — LessWrong

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“see this one, with his defensive footnote up top: www.lesswrong.com/posts/4ARaTp... check this one: www.lesswrong.com/posts/5wMcKN... is there anything in this corpus that indicates a belief that natural language and significant progress on values comes WEL…”

“basically you just need the Very Basic information theory 101: no Markov process (approximately everything is a Markov process) can add mutual information with its input through local operations. rationalists do not think that this is exactly false, just tr…”

4 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Grace: Which is an annoying thing to do, but that’s also another critique
Grace: You can argue that rationalist‘s don‘t *practice* empiricism, but that’s a different critique. It’s hard to imagine a clearer endorsement than putting it as one of your “12 Virtues of Rationality”
Grace: This just isn’t true at all: “The sixth virtue is empiricism. The roots of knowledge are in observation and its fruit is prediction. What tree grows without roots?”
Open the full discussion →
New Safety & security Analysis 22h ago
alignment vs safety engineering argument

We Don't Need Alignment. We Need Real Safety Engineering. - Doll's AI Takes

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“dolls-ai-takes.pckt.blog/we-dont-need...”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Doll: Are you looking for a genuine answer
Doll: They simply do not have that dog in them, and its unlikely they ever will.
Doll: dolls-ai-takes.pckt.blog/we-dont-need...
Open the full discussion →
Established Agents & robotics Analysis 10d ago
⚡ 3 h early
Artificial Analysis v5 benchmark release

Artificial Analysis v5 and the benchmarker's dilemma

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“from: www.interconnects.ai/p/artificial...”

2 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Nathan Lambert: Private benchmarks often show open models are further behind, but the problem with private benchmarks is you don’t have the community to squash the inevitable bugs for you. I'm 50/50 on if I think …
Nathan Lambert: from: www.interconnects.ai/p/artificial...
jake: how about an open consortium to run the benchmarks? not crawlable, but open enough that there are enough eyeballs?
Open the full discussion →
Established Models & releases Analysis 16d ago
Lambert open language models essay

Open Language Models

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Finally got to put together a complete deck on the state of open models. What they are, licenses, how competitive they are, signs people are using them, distillation's impact, and how we balance the risks and benefits of openness! natolambert.com/slides/202…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Nathan Lambert: Will record a video lecture of these soon, and hopefully re-do them a few times a year.
Nathan Lambert: Finally got to put together a complete deck on the state of open models. What they are, licenses, how competitive they are, signs people are using them, distillation's impact, and how we balance th…
SE Gyges: Finally got to put together a complete deck on the state of open models. What they are, licenses, how competitive they are, signs people are using them, distillation's impact, and how we balance th…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 23 posts · 21h ago
SE Gyges: "superintelligence" is such a weird fucking shibboleth but it does pretty clearly indicat ideas are downstream of the rationalists on this one i am generically pretty pro regulation but this specif…
SE Gyges: sorry, "artificial superintelligence". influence runs very directly from the rats to Bernie to this. the trump version drops the "artificial" for whatever absurd reason
Open the thread →
5 experts · 27 posts · 15d ago
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
SE Gyges: unpopular opinion, "admits uncertainty" and "flags nuances" are shit. they are terrible fucking traits actually. is the sky blue? do we really know that? what is blue, anyway? many cultures have di…
SE Gyges: if gemini argon is a remarkably good model it is good because it is simply not optimized for this specific set of toxic, absurd, brain-poisoned behavior. it would actually defy belief that it happe…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 11 posts · 8d ago
SE Gyges: "i wonder what the basilisk guy is up to"
SE Gyges: "AI pause is the rational and correct position so we need white people in charge or they'll build AI and destroy humanity." is, it turns out, one of the positions you can take
Open the thread →
3 experts · 22 posts · 12d ago
SE Gyges: tfw twitter anons are the only people with the courage to just say shit like "Elon is deliberately tanking the GPU rental market with his dominant position to try to cull his competitors"
SE Gyges: and: yes, endorse, this is true or very close to true. he bought too many GPUs, he cannot really make money on them, he has been offloading them in bulk and still has too many, he is either deliber…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 14 posts · 15d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: "my best case future involves people competing viciously with each other for power forever" is just so fucking grim to me man
SE Gyges: if you are mad that we are not moving to the star trek future you should, like, try to chart course for that future. why would anyone do less
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
SE Gyges: ai is a science in the way chemistry was a science in the year 1900 90% of all risk predictions are the equivalent of an alchemist telling you that you're going to create an evil homunculus because…
SE Gyges: we are in the funny position where 1) ai, the science, is in the position of chemistry in 1900, and 2) our alchemists and phlogiston theorists etc etc are still around these are two separate proble…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 7 posts · 9d ago
Ted Underwood: So, my friends have convinced me it’s not true that AI leads inevitably to cognitive surrender. But I’m getting a *little* worried <looks around at friends a second time> that it leads either to co…
Ted Underwood: Not that there's anything wrong with frenetic metacognitive mad scientists! The vibes are immaculate, imo. But I guess I can see how maybe it's not a viable plan for *the whole* human species.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 28 posts · 20d ago
SE Gyges: a lot of opposition to AI is rent seeking, and the material incentives of being a rentier, even a small time one, lead you towards fascist conclusions from first principles
SE Gyges: i get this reaction a lot, usually when i am saying something mean about people adjacent to them people decide i am committing heinous category errors of some kind. i think i am roughly as deranged…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 13 posts · 16d ago
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
SE Gyges: okay, what the hell? i expected php to bungle their security patch. i did not expect openai to brag about how smooth and great the process was and how proud they are of it here they should not be p…
SE Gyges: taking into account current events one cannot in fact announce a world-ending CVE in a widely available open source library a full day before patching it. openai is uniquely positioned to be aware …
Open the thread →