Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Our position on open-weights models Policy & governance · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Tim Kellogg ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 12h ago

Gpt frontier intelligence efficiency

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Sung Kim
“OpenAI used GPT-5.6 Sol to make it efficient to run. The results: - 20% lower serving costs from production GPU kernel improvements. - 15%+ better token-generation efficiency from improved speculative decoding. openai.com/index/gpt-5-...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg Sung Kim

“OpenAI used GPT-5.6 Sol to make it efficient to run. The results: - 20% lower serving costs from production GPU kernel improvements. - 15%+ better token-generation efficiency from improved speculative decoding. openai.com/index/gpt-5-...”

“gpt-5.6-sol is improving its own serving stack, gaining 20% here and 15% there this is a weak form of RSI openai.com/index/gpt-5-...”

3 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Tim Kellogg: gpt-5.6-sol is improving its own serving stack, gaining 20% here and 15% there this is a weak form of RSI openai.com/index/gpt-5-...
Thomas Dietterich: But this is completely uninteresting. We've had supercompilers for several years. I'll be impressed when we start seeing systems that can deal with novelty by inventing new conceptual frameworks.
Mark Riedl: Most RSI is likely to be uninteresting. Anything interesting is likely to be really really hard medium.com/@mark-riedl/...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Developing Models & releases Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 1 h early
Anthropic open-weights position statement

Our position on open-weights models

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ted Underwood
“I respect the candor here. But I don't agree with the geopolitics, at all. The line between democracies and autocracies is not as crisp as this pretends. How much do we trust, e.g., an AI company in a competitive-authoritarian state that launches sneak deca…” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Tim Kellogg Sung Kim James MacGlashan Dare Obasanjo Larry Hunter Fran Litterio +2
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Dario Amodei clarifies that Anthropic doesn’t want to ban open weight model. It instead wants 1. A ban on selling powerful chips or chipmaking equipment to China. 2. A crack down on industrial-scale distillation operations. 3. Mandatory safety testing of fr…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“I respect the candor here. But I don't agree with the geopolitics, at all. The line between democracies and autocracies is not as crisp as this pretends. How much do we trust, e.g., an AI company in a competitive-authoritarian state that launches sneak deca…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Dario explains Anthropic’s position on open weights models It’s a lot of words to say that they’re still against powerful open weights models www.anthropic.com/news/positio...”

5 experts discussed this · 13 posts
Ted Underwood: I respect the candor here. But I don't agree with the geopolitics, at all. The line between democracies and autocracies is not as crisp as this pretends. How much do we trust, e.g., an AI company i…
Ted Underwood: (just, say, hypothetically?) There's also internal incoherence in making the first part of this all about moralized great-power competition and then saying that safety testing (incl for alignment r…
SE Gyges: he kisses jd vance's ass and fails to specify anything concerning his proposed evaluation regime that distinguishes it from a ban solid dario post 10/10
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Developing Models & releases Signal 1d ago

Openai anthropic staff share letter asking us to help pace ai progress

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“people from OpenAI and Anthropic sign letter calling for a slowdown of AI development, so society has a chance to catch up www.bloomberg.com/news/article...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg

“people from OpenAI and Anthropic sign letter calling for a slowdown of AI development, so society has a chance to catch up www.bloomberg.com/news/article...”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Tim Kellogg: people from OpenAI and Anthropic sign letter calling for a slowdown of AI development, so society has a chance to catch up www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Tim Kellogg: who are those?
Tim Kellogg: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source bloomberg.com ↗
Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago

imjustnewatai (@imjustnewatai) on X

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“some are guessing that Ilya Surskever’s SSI is developing continual learning source: x.com/imjustnewata...” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg

“some are guessing that Ilya Surskever’s SSI is developing continual learning source: x.com/imjustnewata...”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Tim Kellogg: some are guessing that Ilya Surskever’s SSI is developing continual learning source: x.com/imjustnewata...
tachikoma: the question is why other labs aren't pursuing such research directions - it's not like continual learning hasn't been identified by dozens of names as a promising avenue to human-like learning and…
Tim Kellogg: i unfortunately can’t speak about why they’re not seeing success. all i know is catastrophic forgetting has been a big problem Ilya seems to have gone back to the brain for inspiration, whatever th…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source x.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 21 posts · 3d ago
Tim Kellogg Grace SE Gyges Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Building & implementation
“Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms
Grace: Maybe that’s just broke and bespoke combined? (Besproke?)
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 8h ago
Tim Kellogg Vikram Saraph
Matches Building & implementation
“probably a vast majority then, AI is integrated into to so much media now” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
Tim Kellogg: how much of anti-AI ideas are propagated by AI?
Vikram Saraph: Probably depends on your definition of “propagated by AI”. What counts? Do, eg, AI summaries by Google count?
Open the thread →