Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 8h ago

Misleading Metaphors, Real Risks

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Melanie Mitchell, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Henry Farrell
“I wrote down my thoughts about the last several weeks of AI hell. aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 21 posts
Melanie Mitchell: I wrote down my thoughts about the last several weeks of AI hell. aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...
Kate Devlin: I wrote down my thoughts about the last several weeks of AI hell. aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...
Benjamin Riley: @eryk.bsky.social if you haven't seen already
Open the full discussion →
New Agents & robotics Development 14h ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI agents attack RubyGems

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · LiveOverflow
“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5”

Markets & investment

1 expert

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Cybercrime as a valuation boosting strategy is just the done thing, now.”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“Another undisclosed openai hack. How long till somebody actually presses charges? www.rubyhack.ai”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Grace: OpenAI: “Our agents used RubyGems to carry out benign tasks” The agents: “so I named the file hack.rb,”
Grace: https://www.rubyhack.ai
Grace: A country of moustache-twirling villains in a datacenter
Open the full discussion →
New AI field signal Analysis 14h ago
⚡ 474 h early
Why we fear AI book essay

Why We Fear AI: On the Interpretation of Nightmares — Common Notions Press

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Hagen Blix
“The projection of the climate threat onto AI is a major theme of our book, too” evidence ↗
3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“The projection of the climate threat onto AI is a major theme of our book, too”

“this piece arguing against nationalizing AI is really good. not surprised! @hagenblix.bsky.social and Ingeborg's book was a hit with the reading group when we read it a few months ago”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Hagen Blix: See, so much AI stuff is just the subconscious of capital: "What if people didn't have to know things?" "What if we could just automate the realization of value, without input from pesky humans/con…
Hagen Blix: Read all about it here I guess 🤷
Long Lasting Mascot: “What if we have a system that turns everything into paperclips without thinking about why”
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 41 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“i’m not confident that you can read it that way, because the labs are simultaneously reporting increased risk while also reportedly down-training or content filtering in those areas so we’re effect…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 4 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: perspective. i’m not sure if i agree or disagree. but he’s thought about it, so..
jake: yeah, and @david-p-reichert.bsky.social thinks about it more than I do, professionally, so probably listen to him more than I (I do still wish The Professionals published lists of various guestimat…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 33 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“you are missing the point. The concern is not that it will cheat at chess; the concern is that it will commit genocide.” evidence ↗
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →
5 experts · 18 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Hot take / unpopular opinion especially on this site, but I'm not sure Anthropic are "evil", though I have concerns sure. I also think EA folks and the people associated with "longtermism" (depends…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Concern & critique · 1
tachikoma: A group of 25 Fields Medalists, including myself, have made a joint declaration on Math and AI: mathandai.org . We welcome additional signatories. See also this article in the Economist announcing …
Aaron Hertzmann: Do you have a call to action, a request or demand for what is to be done? "These issues must be addressed..." is pretty vague. IMO a position statement without a concrete, justifiable call to actio…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 10 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Again, I am happy to stand with y’all, but I think we might take a moment to reflect on why the march of AI became so much more of an existential threat when it came for the practical fields, the s…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Bisexual of the Blade (Alt-text or DIE): Gonna be extremely petty for a moment: I am glad to stand in solidarity with my colleagues in mathematics against the tyranny of AI slop, but I have to ask: where the fuck were most of y’all when t…
Dr. Johnathan Flowers, Bisexual of the Blade (Alt-text or DIE): Again, I am happy to stand with y’all, but I think we might take a moment to reflect on why the march of AI became so much more of an existential threat when it came for the practical fields, the s…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 17 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“I think the nuance about “escaping” is valuable. When your dog escapes you have to go physically catch him. When your agent escapes, well, it hasn’t really escaped, it’s still just right there wher…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Colin: I think the nuance about “escaping” is valuable. When your dog escapes you have to go physically catch him. When your agent escapes, well, it hasn’t really escaped, it’s still just right there wher…
tweety fish: I can't stand the metaphors, sorta broadly, but I don't think that's why; I feel like they affirmatively make it harder for people who are not experts (plus some who are, I guess) to think about wh…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“like the problem isn’t that “junior devs won’t be able to learn from senior devs” it’s that the entire learning pipeline in the real world is based on being in orgs that allow safe failure and the …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
tweety fish: parsimoniously, we will relatively soon see junior devs that are native to agentic coding with harnesses in ways that allow them to blow the doors off what senior devs can do. there'll probably be …
tweety fish: I didn't mean in terms of writing code faster, particularly. I mean in terms of knowing how to steer them and what is important and what's not to have an end result of reliable extruded software.
Open the thread →
4 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“The first one it was like whoopsies we hacked HuggingFace 🤗 but don’t worry they’re not mad about it, it’s kind of funny actually, here’s a joint blog about it 🍿🍿 But now it’s like ok yeah the agen…” evidence ↗
Colin: The labs must be starting to think all these cyberattacks are starting to not be cute anymore
Colin: The first one it was like whoopsies we hacked HuggingFace 🤗 but don’t worry they’re not mad about it, it’s kind of funny actually, here’s a joint blog about it 🍿🍿 But now it’s like ok yeah the agen…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“OpenAI did not "lose control", the agents did not go "rogue" and there is no "swarm" that "escaped". all control and responsibility remains firmly in the hands of these "frontier" labs. most import…” evidence ↗
Abeba Birhane: OpenAI did not "lose control", the agents did not go "rogue" and there is no "swarm" that "escaped". all control and responsibility remains firmly in the hands of these "frontier" labs. most import…
Brad Wyble: You might enjoy this thread too: bsky.app/profile/been...
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“I think that was clear when you critiqued his rhyme scheme ;)” evidence ↗
Benjamin Riley: I often disagree with @timkellogg.me, but not on this. Something important is happening.
Benjamin Riley: Also @timkellogg.me despite our many disagreements, I will say I appreciate that you post on here as an unabashed AI enthusiast. We need to hear that voice, your voice, on Bluesky. Still gonna quot…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“I don’t think there’s *no* vector of attack, but I think there’s basically no realistic vector that doesn’t have a pretty obvious escalation ladder of precursor mini-dooms first. If I were to back …” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
jake: I don’t think there’s *no* vector of attack, but I think there’s basically no realistic vector that doesn’t have a pretty obvious escalation ladder of precursor mini-dooms first. If I were to back …
jake: Agreed that surveillance state, automated warfare, cybercrime (inc video phishing our parents retirement accts) are more near-term pressing. And that countering most steps on vectors of doom are do…
Open the thread →