Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by austin ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Release 7d ago
⚡ 432 h early
talkie vintage 1930 language model release

Introducing talkie: a 13B vintage language model from 1930

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“It's a good question, and one someone tried out! With an LLM trained only on pre-1930 text they were able to teach it to write python code with just a few examples simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/28/...”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“Like the entire point of an LLM is that it can generalize based on instructions. People have proven this! Go look at the source here; a LLM trained only on pre-1930s text was able to write python based on in-context examples. simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/28/...”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
brennan: love the sign off "for more information, follow <the person most famously wrong about all of this for years>"
Pwnallthethings: There's several examples of it, not least of all in math and engineering. But the reason *why* LLMs are good at that is because beyond a certain point, predicting words hyper-accurately requires so…
Pwnallthethings: I mean, the math cases are the most impressive because math *is* formal reasoning. That's ultimately what solving a math problem means
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 16 posts · 17d ago
Multiple readings Opportunity & adoption · 2 Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: 6. This is more niche but LLMs are very, very good at converting unstructured details of an optimization problem into an exact formal model that can then be used 7. LLMs can create initial versions…
Eugene Vinitsky: 4. Sometimes there's a concept or tool that I know must exist but I can only describe it vaguely. LLMs can frequently name it, which I can then go and verify 5. I use LLMs to fill out many forms be…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 16 posts · 17d ago
rev. howard arson: the thing is that the "realistic doll" metaphor is more intuitive than the "animal" one, because a duck doesn't care if you yell at it and it is unethical to painlessly kill five hundred ducks ever…
rev. howard arson: claude's ontological status is "an ant who lives on a map of the world." so it seems sensible to say that the map is not real, and the ant therefore isn't. the problem is that the moment i am exper…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 31 posts · 20h ago
austin: Hello from #AGNTCon! I'm presenting about what we learned building the @honeycomb.io MCP server. If you'd like to follow along, follow this thread! Otherwise, feel free to mute it. Let's get it sta…
austin: If you're trying to understand an MCP server by looking at access logs, you're gonna have a bad time. Here's a typical access log pattern - dozens of requests, all of them successful. JSON-RPC hide…
Open the thread →
5 experts · 12 posts · 11d ago
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Policy & governance · 1
austin: I disagree w/anil on this point specifically because I do not believe AI can write non-copyleft code just as matter of legal principle. I don’t know how much it practically _matters_ but I think it…
austin: I also think that the upshot of this is that communities become more important than before, although they start to look very different. Maybe the principle of OSS starts to look more like standards…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 21 posts · 10d ago
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Cat Hicks: What must it be like to get this much press for causing unmotivated participant dropout on Prolific
austin: 'if it bleeds, it leads' but for arxiv preprints?
Open the thread →
3 experts · 9 posts · 2d ago
austin: I mean pretty good keeping it under wraps for 2 months or so
SE Gyges: people were publishing hot exploit code for it 12+ hours before embargo lift and it was irresponsible to try to continue on the normal remediation path once that was happening
Open the thread →
4 experts · 5 posts · 2d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
austin: guess that anthropic paper on evil AI hiding in your fridge is more plausible now
apenwarr.ca: In all honesty the IoT device that never receives updates surely already had security holes. At least now you can make it do things. All discontinued-before-2026 Sonos devices? Hmmmmm
Open the thread →
3 experts · 10 posts · 4d ago
Gus: I replied to a Gemma user asking what they would like to see in future Gemma models, and somehow this became my most popular post ever! With great insights and requests. Thanks everyone! 🤩🙏🏼 I trie…
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Something dense in the ~8-9B range would be great. The best thing out there right now is Qwen 3.5 9B, which is several generations old. Builtin speculative decoding would be great :)
Open the thread →