Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by mackuba.eu ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 7h ago
⚡ 56 h early

An alien mind

14 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Dare Obasanjo, Max Zeff
“OpenAI’s chief scientist just wrote a blog post that argues AI models will soon be smart enough to improve themselves yet their ability to monitor how they reason is getting worse. Yet he argues they need to keep building smarter AI partly to defend against…” evidence ↗
14 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

15 experts · 40 posts · 5d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“A large amount of people are hating on Dame and Bailey for building the "bsky38" voting site that was going around the last few days, after they discovered that AI was used in building it, and espe…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
11 experts · 78 posts · 20d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“Yeah, so far. I highly doubt that tech which is highly useful for general software will somehow prove “not useful” in game development. It’s probably more due to social factors than functionality, …” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Opportunity & adoption · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
mackuba.eu: FFS, this is so fucked… 😩 Would it kill the people here to not chase away any tech person who comes here and says something about AI?… I really want tech discussions and communities to hang out her…
Mike Masnick: And now I'm getting shit upon for merely repeating what people told me, which some jackasses are misrepresenting. 🙄 Doing a lot of blocking unfortunately.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 39 posts · 1d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“it's actually just that my posting history for the last hour right now is a litany of horrors that depresses me and i'm trying to avoid building the pile higher” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
SE Gyges: trying to deduce why one would quit a good job at anthropic
SE Gyges: what her boyfriend is up to today. they really do get around
Open the thread →
6 experts · 18 posts · 17d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“I'm not so sure anymore. I would simply never recommend Anthropic models for development or agent deployment anymore, it's just much easier to use almost anything else now” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
mackuba.eu: 👀
mackuba.eu: Huh
Open the thread →