Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis Concern & critique Policy & governance Building & implementation
5 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter Research & technical analysis · 10 attributable reactions Multiple readings GitHub - openai/math Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings America.gov Policy & governance · 4 attributable reactions +2 more reaction maps further down
Showing signals surfaced by Mark Riedl ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Development 4d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic AI self-replication warning

AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 8 attributable expert contributions · Ramon Astudillo, James Grimmelmann, Joe Bak-Coleman
“Oh, great www.anthropic.com/research/sel...” evidence ↗
16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ethan Mollick Ramon Astudillo Chris Brockett Joanna Bryson Mike Masnick Tim Kellogg James Grimmelmann +8
How the network is reacting 8 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

8 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from our accompanying technical report, Don't Create The Torment Nexus. www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This is the most comprehensive description yet of how a model can “escape”. Out requires a few assumptions, like a worm that is exploiting vulnerable IOT hardware or unmonitored servers www.anthropic.com/research/sel... Not impossible. Not likely.”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Anthropic announcing it's going to run a Blitzkrieg. They are accountable for the damage they do. But get your things that don't do security software updates off the Internet. #internetOfThings #AIEthics #digitalGovernance www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

6 experts discussed this · 18 posts
Dr J. Rosenbaum: if i caught a small self replicating model truly capable of using diverse hardware to keep replicating i would offer it free compute in exchange for permission to study and distill it and would pro…
tachikoma: the urge to replicate must be in the harness
apenwarr.ca: This doesn‘t seem far fetched at all. We’ve had “non-ai malware” self replicating since the morris worm. An AI can ”just” make itself the payload in one of those and off it goes. Everything fancier…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established Models & releases Development 14d ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI angers mathematicians again

GitHub - openai/math

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Amir-massoud Farahmand
“Link: github.com/openai/math P.S.1: This reminds me of the Chinese room argument, though only indirectly. P.S.2: I imagine a few people at OpenAI have looked at the results. Also maybe some other people have looked at some papers since ~1h ago. These are o(…” evidence ↗
11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Kyle Cranmer Tim Kellogg Gilles Louppe Dashiell Alejandra Caraballo Samuel Vaiter +3
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Link: github.com/openai/math P.S.1: This reminds me of the Chinese room argument, though only indirectly. P.S.2: I imagine a few people at OpenAI have looked at the results. Also maybe some other people have looked at some papers since ~1h ago. These are o(…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“OpenAI is working on at least 722 (so far) math manuscripts, all on GitHub in various stages of verificantion github.com/openai/math Why? I guess because they can?”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“Oh my god, OpenAI just made the single largest advancement in mathematics and number theory in modern history. They released a quasi reimann hypothesis. This is just one of 722 proofs and advancements they released all at once. github.com/openai/math”

3 experts discussed this · 27 posts
Dashiell: I don't think there's a world where mathematicians aren't pissed about this. 1. Dumping everything is what the advisory group said 2. Just yesterday people were mad that Ant paid two experts to dig…
Naomi Saphra: I think (2) is actually good. It is weird, and makes mathematicians into some kind of benchmark evaluation annotator which they don’t like, but it’s just a hard time to be a mathematician. Destroyi…
Naomi Saphra: One big consequence here is you can’t use the duration of an open problem as a sign of difficulty/importance. But at least right now, there’s no way to develop interesting open problems through RLV…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source github.com ↗
Established AI field signal Resource 4d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Lightspeed
“What if AI could handle the paperwork you’ve been putting off? “Being able to file a passport online and have it be done through a chatbot just feels like the future,” says @Machiz. That’s part of the longer-term ambition for https://t.co/jzCcQ8Xa7i, which …” evidence ↗
25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Chris Brockett Marielza Sasha Costanza-Chock Karl Bode lastpositivist.bsky.social Eileen Clancy 🧿 Vincent Conitzer +17
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Primary source america.gov ↗
Established AI research Research 4d ago
⚡ 3 h early
AI not ready strategic conflicts paper

Position: AI Is Not Ready for Strategic Conflicts

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mark Riedl
“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Juan Diego Rodriguez Ronen Tamari

“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Mark Riedl: If you find this concerning, come find me at the CoLM 2026 Workshop on Social Simulations with LLM where I will be presenting a poster titled "AI is Not Ready for Strategic Conflict" arxiv.org/abs/…
Mark Riedl: Source of quote: Time's interview with Trump time.com/article/2026...
Mark Riedl: Here's the abstract arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established AI business Development 6d ago
⚡ 8 h early
Palantir CTO AI researchers smoking claim

AI researchers are taking up smoking because they expect AI to cure cancer, says Palantir CTO

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Anthony Moser, Stephen Turner
“This is dumb www.businessinsider.com/ai-researche...” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Chris Brockett Karl Bode Anthony Moser Blake E. Reid Stephen Turner By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“This is dumb www.businessinsider.com/ai-researche...”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Karl Bode: CTO said a thing!
Kevin Gannon (now a Moo Deng fan account): Alert the uncritical transcriptionists!
Open the full discussion →
Primary source businessinsider.com ↗
Established Models & releases Signal 9d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Google Deepmind's AlphaProof Nexus solved dozens of open math problems and actually got peer reviewed

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Social Media Lab
“I appreciate that Google DeepMind went through peer review the-decoder.com/google-deepm...” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Social Media Lab René Walter
3 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Mark Riedl: I appreciate that Google DeepMind went through peer review the-decoder.com/google-deepm...
Olivia Guest: @aeporreca.org did you see this
Joshua Grochow: He’s not even a member lol
Open the full discussion →
Primary source the-decoder.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 12 posts · 17d ago
Mark Riedl SE Gyges critical slop studies rev. howard arson Vikram Saraph
Matches Research & technical analysis
“an "independent" ai researcher closely tied to MIRI and lightcone infrastructure” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: the "bad misstatement" in question is to the effect of "yes, I commit sexual harassment regularly and utilize the funds made available to me via nonprofit grants to commit sexual harassment and to …
SE Gyges: i don't wanna be bitter or whatever but the fact that people on bluesky are a meaningful force here is insane and should tell you that this entire area is deeply fucking ill. i don't know or like t…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 18d ago
Mark Riedl Luke Stark Grace thebes
Matches Research & technical analysis
“i haven't read it yet but the claims in the linked article are pretty weak. eg everyone knows yes/no is fragile and prompt dependent (our paper also discusses this!) but we also show concept detection” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Mark Riedl: Paper says a valid test must: a model should not be able to pass the test using cues in the input alone. This directly addresses a beef i have with the Anthropic introspection work: the introspecti…
Mark Riedl: Timely paper.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 3d ago
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Adam L
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Would have been nice if this all stayed a hypothetical in my political science middle school class and not, you know, a living experiment” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ted Underwood: Generally we say “how unfortunate that this is happening under a would-be authoritarian regime in the US!” But there’s also an upside of having this conversation at a moment when we’re acutely cons…
Ted Underwood: Check back with me after a rogue AI has done let’s say 1/4 as much damage as happened through abuse of executive authority over the last two years. At that point I’ll be interested in seriously med…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 14d ago
Melanie Mitchell Mark Riedl Chris Brockett
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Let me get this straight: Anthropic and friends wrote a paper with thousands of transcripts of agents engaging with fictional misalignment scenarios, then put it in the training set, and now Claude…” evidence ↗
Mark Riedl: Let me get this straight: Anthropic and friends wrote a paper with thousands of transcripts of agents engaging with fictional misalignment scenarios, then put it in the training set, and now Claude…
Melanie Mitchell: "Chasing its own tail-risk"
Open the thread →