Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by david-p-reichert.bsky.social ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Research 1d ago
⚡ 3 h early
global workspace theory language models paper

Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models

15 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

15 experts 5 communities 2 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Opportunity & adoption

4 experts

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“here is the Anthropic blog: transformer-circuits.pub/2026/workspa... I don't really like the framing of whether LLMs are conscious or not. It's completely unnecessary. As is the hand-waiving about whether LLMs have something equivalent to the (functional) g…”

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“No one is presenting this as a certainty. They are presenting it as an empirical observation, partially through the capabilities of the models, and partially by examining what is going on in side of them e.g. www.anthropic.com/research/glo...”

Building & implementation

2 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Some really interesting research from Anthropic that AI models have spontaneously developed a workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access" Demo of how this works: www.neuronpedia.org/qwen3.6-27b/... Research: www.anthro…”

7 experts discussed this · 203 posts
Anil Dash: this is not an accurate description of what's happening. not least because I can write code and get them to output something different there. I can understand why it *seems* that way, but this is j…
Anil Dash: Who are you explaining this to?
Anil Dash: Do you see why explaining "All output from AI has to be validated" in a reply to me here is... not a useful contribution?
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Signal 13d ago

An open letter to steven pinker on

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I got insulted online by Scott Alexander! Fun times. I guess he hasn't read any of my work since the 1980s. https://t.co/KmciJm7gjx https://t.co/JwlKYdZS9l”

“Steven Pinker, in the twilight of his career, remains undefeated in his capacity to embarrass himself in public by saying dumb things about topics outside his expertise www.astralcodexten.com/p/an-open-le...”

3 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Aaron Clauset: Steven Pinker, in the twilight of his career, remains undefeated in his capacity to embarrass himself in public by saying dumb things about topics outside his expertise www.astralcodexten.com/p/an-…
Carlos Scheidegger: Although, given this specific poster, I’m presently of the ”let them fight” persuasion
Aaron Clauset: Heh. Yes. 🍿 Meanwhile, the rest of us "regular intellectuals" can stay focused on doing the slower, harder work of actual science?
Open the full discussion →
Established Policy & governance Signal 13d ago
⚡ 1055 h early

Usage Policy

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 10 posts
Kat Tenbarge: Anthropic banning “abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude in its new usage policies is proof to me that tech companies are going to moderate violence against AI before they ever moderate violence…
Alex Hanna: Anthropic banning “abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude in its new usage policies is proof to me that tech companies are going to moderate violence against AI before they ever moderate violence…
Neil Turkewitz: 🙏🏽🎯 God, the irony of Anthropic restricting “abusive or cruel behavior” towards Claude while operating a system dependent on stolen property which effectively recapitulates its origin story by erod…
Open the full discussion →
Established AI field signal Analysis 20d ago
AI code-shaped world essay

AI and a code-shaped world: some examples

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“Some examples for me: davidpreichert.substack.com/p/ai-and-a-c...”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: The goal remains the same: convey to people who haven't been exposed to recent developments what is now becoming possible, so that we can take AI seriously and figure out what this all means for th…
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: A follow-up to my last substack about agents vs chatbots. This time I'm showing some more down-to-earth examples of agents in action, as opposed to machine learning. Anything from modelling histori…
Benjamin Riley: Interesting read. Re "what if more of the rest of the world shapes itself around coding?", given the mounting stories about AI agents exploiting cybersecurity vulnerabilities, I wonder (ok suspect)…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 20 posts · 7d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Grace: So either we have fictional characters that are integrated into our world in this way, or these characters have ceased to be fully fictional in some way.
Grace: Beyond this, LLM personas also close the loop of output and input- they can take actions in the world, see the results of those actions, and react to them. So they become causally integrated into o…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 13 posts · 11d ago
Shared emphasis Context & explanation · 2
rev. howard arson: i think the more plausible implication is that consciousness is a family of related reflexive models of future states which are not always aggregated in the way that they are in humans, and "are LL…
rev. howard arson: the thing is that I agree that consciousness is linked to something timeline but you're talking about a dimension with a specifically Lorentzian signature (which does not seem to be important to me…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 8d ago
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
SE Gyges: anthropic cares about safety as long as it is purely hypothetical safety that does not meaningfully impede their operations or profitability. they got into an argument with the government about a h…
david-p-reichert.bsky.social: Can I ask, in your view, how do you think Anthropic compares to the other labs here?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 8d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: Like, I don't agree with their arguments! But if you follow their own arguments to their conclusions, they literally should not be allowed to pursue their own research without extreme government ov…
Eugene Vinitsky: Most AI doom arguments are implicitly arguments for nationalizing the labs.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 12d ago
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
René Walter: "LLMs posting false evidence on police websites during testing" is the new Huggingface Incident. "According to Anthropic, via the police statement, its model was conducting a test" - no. Anthropic …
René Walter: Anthropic is really starting to piss me off, especially because they brand themselves as doing "responsible AI research". Another example is the recent wellfare nonsense, LLMs as a moral patient an…
Open the thread →