Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Hypervisible ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Development 16d ago
⚡ 1 h early
Anthropic AI misuse September report

Countering misuse of AI: September 2026 / Anthropic

18 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Michiel Bakker
“@kotekjedi_ml Here Ant's report https://t.co/22vHruWVqH And the paper from @kotekjedi_ml @DavidSchmotz @iliaishacked https://t.co/wuCpNZaQ0d” evidence ↗
18 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 7 experts are independently emphasizing concern & critique.
Reaction converging

Concern & critique

7 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Report here. www.anthropic.com/threat-intel...”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Thomson Reuters announced it is moving off Claude to Alibaba's Qwen to cut costs. From today's Anthropic report: Alibaba extracted 151M+ Claude exchanges to help train Qwen. TR now deploys Westlaw on a vast trove of stolen US IP. @AnthropicAI's report: http…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“@kotekjedi_ml Here Ant's report https://t.co/22vHruWVqH And the paper from @kotekjedi_ml @DavidSchmotz @iliaishacked https://t.co/wuCpNZaQ0d”

Established Culture, work & education Development 8d ago
⚡ 37 h early
Napster AI teacher cloning launch

Napster Is Back, and It Wants to Digitally Clone Teachers

5 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Williamson
“Many out there want to treat AI in education seriously. Then there's this from *Napster*. "Trained on a teacher’s material, courses, and papers, these digital twins will live online, becoming a 'copy of yourself that you can then use to scale your time.'” w…” evidence ↗
5 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Many out there want to treat AI in education seriously. Then there's this from *Napster*. "Trained on a teacher’s material, courses, and papers, these digital twins will live online, becoming a 'copy of yourself that you can then use to scale your time.'” w…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“Really odd repackaging. Will parents who spent time in their dorm rooms downloading music with Napster want it now to clone teachers? That seems like a hard sell.”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Hypervisible : Every future imagined by a tech company is worse than the previous iteration.
Hypervisible : “Trained on a teacher’s material, courses, and papers, these digital twins will live online, becoming a ‘copy of yourself that you can then use to scale your time.’” 💀
Charles Logan: Every future imagined by a tech company is worse than the previous iteration.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

8 experts · 30 posts · 9d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I have found "stochastic parrots" is an excellent filter for parsing out who responds to meme discourse and who genuinely reads papers.” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ali Alkhatib: can't think of any authors continuing to talk about stochastic parrots as much as its critics seem to do. they've all founded research institutes, written books, etc if you want people to pick up a…
Ali Alkhatib: its usefulness as a framework, like all conceptual frameworks, is mediated to some extent (maybe entirely determined!) by its usefulness to people. if it continues to be useful, then its not a bad …
Open the thread →
4 experts · 15 posts · 6d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“They never do the reading. Honestly many of them never even read the SP paper because they routinely misinterpret it.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: One of my long-standing complaints with the pro-AI world is how their complaint that anti-AI people and the left "need better critics" is clearly a reflection of themselves not having read the actu…
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: It's way easier to shadowbox with a guy you made up in your head than to do the reading and engage with it honestly, but you do you.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 15 posts · 17d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“The other thing is “AI” has an actual specific incarnation as software that needs other systems to run. LLM models are just a set of non-operable numbers in a file (weights). The models by themselv…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Context & explanation · 1
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: The “AI copies itself to another computer” meme and the “recursive self improvement” meme are both ideas originating in science fiction, but which sound technically plausible enough due to the way …
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: It seems pretty clear that the technologists at the foundation labs are not experts at computer science and software engineering generally but have specialist expertise in only one very narrow aspe…
Open the thread →