“Did you try this yourself? Because I feel like a lot of people who dismiss AI coding outright have no idea what it's like. People are criticizing and fighting the idea of it they have in their head…” evidence ↗
The Who's Who of AI
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.
See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
The questions experts are actively pulling apart
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
No developments match these filters yet.
Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.
Clear filtersWhat experts are discussing without an anchoring article
“Criticism is ok, but what a lot of people are doing here is not criticism (some are openly bragging that they're doing bullying and will be bullying even more)” evidence ↗
“Quite concerned and surprised it is not a bigger focus of discussion in AI policy” evidence ↗
“sorry, list was populated with a bias to false positives because it's a Substantial Problem, you're removed” evidence ↗
“This pace is just crazy. For example, I recently registered a Tencent TokenHub account to make use of their heavily discounted tokens with a Max plan. But they're behind on the models they offer on…” evidence ↗
“No, actually. Cybercrime statues (such as the U.S. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) specifically require mens rea. You're thinking of civil liability ("get sued"), not criminal ("go to prison"). Which…” evidence ↗
“translation: open source ai is only slightly worse than Anthropic's flagship at hacking, once you fix it so that it stops saying things like "that's unethical" and "you shouldn't ransomware hospitals"” evidence ↗
“"ha ha check out this video" is an attack on the Earth's climate and the survivability of all people If you're not standing with us you are not a real person, video-watcher” evidence ↗
“ah sure, yes. some of the labs will fail, but... we'll see soon enough when Anthropic's S1 opens up, but it's widely known that model *inference* is highly profitable (with good margins!). Look at …” evidence ↗
“I despise AI companies and their goals. I am deeply passionate about climate action, and I weigh any positives that AI can bring against the critical need for us to save our planet right now. I am …” evidence ↗
“Yeah nobody wants their IP to get logged even if ant super promises not to steal it. (because they will)” evidence ↗
“I think if anyone is *not* worried about the implications of AI at all, it's honestly worrying itself” evidence ↗