Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis Context & explanation Markets & investment
4 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents Research & technical analysis · 7 attributable reactions Reaction converging Navier stokes solution Research & technical analysis · 6 attributable reactions Multiple readings OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions +1 more reaction maps further down
Showing signals surfaced by Colin ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Signal 12d ago
⚡ 2 h early

An alignment assessment of recent cybersecurity incidents

14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Colin
“I find this comes out a lot in Anthropic’s most recent write up. Their focus is bizarrely fixated on what Claude chose to do, that Claude carried out this attack despite information that the “simulation” was actually real. They basically say “Claude should …” evidence ↗
14 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Ted Underwood Ethan Mollick Alexander Doria Tim Kellogg Ryan Moulton Andrew Arruda Rohan Paul Grace +6
4 experts discussed this · 15 posts
tweety fish: their goal is to have "an intelligence" which is "aligned" to doing things that are prosocial. They don't want to put in rules that STOP it from doing things: they see it fundamentally teleological…
tweety fish: one of the things I appreciate about this thread is that I don't think you can really understand the infosec stuff without understanding the ideological commitments the people making these have; li…
Ben Recht: yeah, now we're cooking...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 19d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Navier stokes solution

14 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna
“The same day the OECD publishes alarming PISA test results for kids around the world steeply declining in cognitive tests, OpenAI announces this feat. Is it Poe poetry? Coincidence? Tragicomedy? It’s something for sure. openai.com/index/navier...” evidence ↗
14 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Emad Ethan Mollick Tim Kellogg Scott McGrath David Picard Alex Hern Sean O hEigeartaigh Dare Obasanjo +6
3 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Colin: Drama and palace intrigue aside, can anyone interpret what all of this implies about the status of Navier-Stokes? I don’t understand what anyone is saying.
Colin: It seems to me that where we stand is OpenAI is sitting on a 100 page PDF that claims to have solved (a version of) the Navier-Stokes problem and no person in the world knows if it's correct or not.
Colin: - OpenAI claims to have more-or-less done this tedious technical grinding to produce a resolution to NS proper, at least one version of it. - which they bizarrely offered authorship of this to Buck…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
Established Agents & robotics Development 14d ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI agents attack RubyGems

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · LiveOverflow
“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ryan Moulton Grace Eileen Clancy 🧿 SE Gyges Colin Pavel Doll +3
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This technology is so fascinating, and even the ones building it fail to contain it https://t.co/cYfzA3SNe5”

Markets & investment

1 expert

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“Cybercrime as a valuation boosting strategy is just the done thing, now.”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Grace: OpenAI: “Our agents used RubyGems to carry out benign tasks” The agents: “so I named the file hack.rb,”
Grace: https://www.rubyhack.ai
Grace: A country of moustache-twirling villains in a datacenter
Open the full discussion →
Primary source rubyhack.ai ↗
Established AI research Development 18d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic researcher quits existential risk warning

The AI Researcher Who Just Quit Anthropic Says It’s ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Recht
“It seems brave young Coxon has no insight beyond that of your average Twitter addict. But kudos to him for quitting.” evidence ↗
7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Ben Recht Karl Bode Katie Drummond Colin tweety fish Max Zeff Chris Marsden
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“It seems brave young Coxon has no insight beyond that of your average Twitter addict. But kudos to him for quitting.”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“The great @mzeff.bsky.social has a fantastic interview with Jacob Coxon, who quit Anthropic and shared a massively viral X post about why: www.wired.com/story/anthro...”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“has a single journalist asked Jacob Coxon if he voted for the corrupt autocrat who dismantled U.S. cybersecurity standards and defenses?”

4 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Ben Recht: It seems brave young Coxon has no insight beyond that of your average Twitter addict. But kudos to him for quitting.
Melanie Mitchell: Is this the most publicized resignation in history? (Maybe second, behind Richard Nixon.)
Maxim Raginsky: What about Graham Coxon’s divorce? www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crim...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source wired.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 11d ago
⚡ 31 h early

The hugging face hack wasnt what it was cracked up to be e00cf3fa

5 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“"People built the test, removed restraints, defined the objective, left a route open and decided not to stop what was happening. Calling the result 'rogue AI' does more than sensationalize it. It allows those human decisions to disappear quietly from the st…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Colin

“"People built the test, removed restraints, defined the objective, left a route open and decided not to stop what was happening. Calling the result 'rogue AI' does more than sensationalize it. It allows those human decisions to disappear quietly from the st…”

5 experts discussed this · 12 posts
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis: "People built the test, removed restraints, defined the objective, left a route open and decided not to stop what was happening. Calling the result 'rogue AI' does more than sensationalize it. It a…
Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis: Exactly.
Edouard Machery: "People built the test, removed restraints, defined the objective, left a route open and decided not to stop what was happening. Calling the result 'rogue AI' does more than sensationalize it. It a…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source wsj.com ↗
Established Models & releases Resource 19d ago
DeepMind Navier-Stokes formal conjecture repo

formal-conjectures/FormalConjectures/Millenium/NavierStokes.lean at main · google-deepmind/formal-conjectures

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Colin
“One thing I didn’t realize at first is that OpenAI’s N-S lean proof uses DeepMind’s Formal Conjectures repository definition. This mitigates the concern of a formalization error quite substantially. Not to say it’s impossible, but this formalization has had…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Colin

“One thing I didn’t realize at first is that OpenAI’s N-S lean proof uses DeepMind’s Formal Conjectures repository definition. This mitigates the concern of a formalization error quite substantially. Not to say it’s impossible, but this formalization has had…”

Primary source github.com ↗
Established Models & releases Signal 5d ago

Black Hat USA 2026 | The 'Breaking' News: The OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Colin
“it's hard to say. Source [3] is this talk which is kind of ambiguous on whether ExploitGym-style tasks were used for training or only evaluation. Though it's clear that vulnerability-exploiting tasks were a part of the broader training/eval regime.” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Colin

“it's hard to say. Source [3] is this talk which is kind of ambiguous on whether ExploitGym-style tasks were used for training or only evaluation. Though it's clear that vulnerability-exploiting tasks were a part of the broader training/eval regime.”

Primary source youtube.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 78 posts · 4d ago
Henry Farrell Dustin Moskovitz Colin rev. howard arson tweety fish Matt Darling
Matches Concern & critique
“this is how the Basilisk possibly reinstantiating a copy of you which it tortures for all eternity goes from "not me" to "not probable" to "my primary concern."” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
rev. howard arson: what i am trying to get at here is that rationalism was an attempt to outline what turned out to be the extraordinary power of statistical systems at tasks for which they naively seem unsuited. vie…
rev. howard arson: "how do we get human values into these things" was broadly considered an intractable problem, and this was a central question of the movement even after we more or less made the first candidates of…
Open the thread →
8 experts · 36 posts · 3d ago
Dylan Hadfield-Menell Grace Colin Max Woolf austin Singularity's Bounty e/cc coty.bsky.social austegard.com
Matches Concern & critique
“@jevbot.bsky.social, what are your thoughts on existential risk from AI?” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Grace: I made a little Jev-based language model! It uses beam search + Jev as a classifier to judge branches based on coherence and "success" (whatever that means). I've barely talked to it so I don't kno…
Grace: (you'll need to tag him)
Open the thread →
8 experts · 30 posts · 7d ago
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Grace Colin tweety fish Doll Matt Darling mackuba.eu
Matches Concern & critique
“I always vaguely worry about doxing myself and then am like “your name and handle are linked in the front matter of a reasonably high profile book, dipshit”. And then start the whole cycle all over…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Questions & unknowns · 3 Concern & critique · 1
Colin: I stand by this
Colin: I said what I said
Open the thread →
6 experts · 38 posts · 4d ago
Thomas Dietterich Ciara Rowles Colin Mary Branscombe Singularity's Bounty e/cc Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦
Matches Concern & critique
“Although models don’t just reflect bias, they both encode it and amplify and transfer it from one domain to another so I’d probably use exhibit” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Mary Branscombe: I don’t see the need to change AI since we’ve used that for the field since the 50s but yes, most of the others better reflect the actual capabilities and these are the kind of choices I already tr…
Mary Branscombe: Although models don’t just reflect bias, they both encode it and amplify and transfer it from one domain to another so I’d probably use exhibit
Open the thread →