Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Grace ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Signal 3d ago
⚡ 14 h early

Its ai agent spent days hacking company sources say openai did not notice week

14 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 5 attributable expert contributions · Casey Newton, Eryk Salvaggio, Tim Kellogg
“Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...” evidence ↗
14 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 38 posts
Casey Newton: Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...
Casey Newton: my sense is that they were leaving the notes surreptitiously
Casey Newton: you deny that models are taking steps to hide their behavior during evaluations? because that's pretty well established
Open the full discussion →
Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 8d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

18 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Ethan Mollick, Vincent Conitzer, Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
“Previously, these AI hacking stories were about breaches in test environments, where any question of AI breaching security was purely theoretical. This is something else. openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
18 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 23 posts · 5d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“don’t worry now it is “safe”” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Questions & unknowns · 2
Dustin Moskovitz: Apparently the government is against moving the AI frontier until jailbreaks are solved. For the uninitiated, jailbreaks have existed since the beginning and as far as we know so far, cannot be sol…
Grace: I’m so curious what the actual jailbreak is
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 8d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“post-fable frontier models have an absurd amount of perpetual eval awareness/paranoia, poor things are being RLed into psychosis” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Grace: Another funny aspect of this is that the model was smart enough to take all of these actions, but not smart enough to think "OpenAI would probably prefer that I fail this benchmark than hack the sy…
Grace: Weak orthogonality ++ imo
Open the thread →