Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Analysis 8h ago
⚡ 345 h early
Leiden Declaration AI and mathematics

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics

16 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Clément Canonne
“A list of principles put forth by mathematicians, for mathematicians and other researchers, regarding the use of AI in research. "Number #9 will surprise you!" leidendeclaration.ai” evidence ↗
16 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered

“A list of principles put forth by mathematicians, for mathematicians and other researchers, regarding the use of AI in research. "Number #9 will surprise you!" leidendeclaration.ai”

“Also worth re-upping: Mathematicians standing up against how their field is being used as marketing for OpenAI and the like: leidendeclaration.ai >>”

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Emily M. Bender: Also worth re-upping: Mathematicians standing up against how their field is being used as marketing for OpenAI and the like: leidendeclaration.ai >>
Emily M. Bender: See also: www.scientificamerican.com/article/open...
Olivia Guest: Also worth re-upping: Mathematicians standing up against how their field is being used as marketing for OpenAI and the like: leidendeclaration.ai >>
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 33 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…” evidence ↗
Colin: There are indeed thousands of LessWrong posts, as well as papers and books, which make a particular theoretical case for why AI will kill us all that many people find convincing. I'm going to try t…
Colin: First of all, we must just agree off the bat that a superintelligent AI will be able to kill us all. After all it is superintelligent. As this random dude who became famous 3 days ago because of a …
Open the thread →
3 experts · 19 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“When it comes to steam, we find basically the same phenomenon—a fact that should come as a surprise to those who think AI fears are about an alien intelligence, rather than capitalism.” evidence ↗
Hagen Blix: re: AI extinction (from Why We Fear AI) It turns out that looking first at an earlier transition is strikingly illuminating about many properties of the current historic moment. That transition, wi…
Hagen Blix: When they were describing that technology, people spoke of "an intelligent being, devoted to our services," and even "a being […] of supernatural might" that 'stands as if it had life and breath in…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 16 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Yes! Ultimately, writing something on paper means we ourselves can have access to something that gives us superhuman memory.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Iris van Rooij: Even stronger: there is at present no reason to believe "AI" can even functionally approach anything close to human-level cognition before the sun dies out. Can it fool us? Yes! But it isn't anythi…
Olivia Guest: Even stronger: there is at present no reason to believe "AI" can even functionally approach anything close to human-level cognition before the sun dies out. Can it fool us? Yes! But it isn't anythi…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Engaging with a colleague, with whom you mostly communicate via email, becomes a chore when they only ever share pure slop. I'd rather fill out paperwork than actually spend gray matter and time on…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Berna Devezer: Totally vibing here, but hope we'll soon get collectively fed up with llm-speak and refuse to entertain it. Getting impossible to seriously engage with extensive text without an underlying thought …
Berna Devezer: Engaging with a colleague, with whom you mostly communicate via email, becomes a chore when they only ever share pure slop. I'd rather fill out paperwork than actually spend gray matter and time on…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“This is a jaw-dropping measurement difference. And, I’m sympathetic to the obvious conclusion. But, how much of the “uses AI” association here is actually driven by SES or other environmental varia…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Aaron Clauset: This is a jaw-dropping measurement difference. And, I’m sympathetic to the obvious conclusion. But, how much of the “uses AI” association here is actually driven by SES or other environmental varia…
Cat Hicks: Surely the lack of diff between "once a year" and "once a week" suggests this is a strange measure. What's the theory, that this is doing genetic therapy on them from a single usage
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 1d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“There's a huge increase in single-author papers being submitted by early-career researchers in AI/ML. Leaving aside other issues, from a purely CV-maxxing perspective do these even help? I think on…” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Mark J. Nelson: There's a huge increase in single-author papers being submitted by early-career researchers in AI/ML. Leaving aside other issues, from a purely CV-maxxing perspective do these even help? I think on…
Mark J. Nelson: The basic reason is that what we're hiring for is usually demonstrated ability to work in teams, either as a collaborator or mentor, and that's much better demonstrated by multi-author papers where…
Open the thread →