Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Questions & unknowns
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Hugging face model evaluation security incident Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 7d ago
⚡ 1 h early

Hugging face model evaluation security incident

18 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Ethan Mollick, Vincent Conitzer, Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真)
“Previously, these AI hacking stories were about breaches in test environments, where any question of AI breaching security was purely theoretical. This is something else. openai.com/index/huggin...” evidence ↗
18 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Thomas Steinke Mor Naaman Tim Kellogg Djamé 🟥 Ryan Calo Grace Anna Mills +10
6 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: This headline is extremely funny given what happened (OpenAI hacked HF by accident) openai.com/index/huggin...
Grace: Maybe the most concerning part is the OpenAI claim to not have known about this before investigating?
Grace: Well, I think the model passed the test
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openai.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 42 posts · 8h ago
Pwnallthethings Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Phillip Carter Doll
Matches Concern & critique
“there was a genuine opportunity to make the world's knowledge universally accessible and useful to the public, and compensate authors, but because Google Books wasn't deemed too big to fail, a sett…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): literally these are books that would be pulped if not bought for 10 cents on the dollar. do rare books sometimes make it into there? yeah, if someone is careless, but that's *upstream* of what happ…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I literally worked on Google Books scanops SRE, ama the same guy who ran Google Books now has the equivalent job at Anthropic and I can promise you that all of us handled every library book with th…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 11h ago
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Doll
Matches Concern & critique
“The claim comes from the 404 media sphere who go out of their way to mislead about AI lol.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): I also worked on Google Book search on the netsec side. Pulping books was for mass market books that you want to scan quickly & cheaply. Anthropic: doing the same thing. It's fine to disagree with …
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): People are conspiracy brain conflating checking out rare library books and scanning them, and destroying mass market books while scanning them. I've even seen assertions Anthropic buys up and destr…
Open the thread →